首页> 外文期刊>International journal of obstetric anesthesia >A randomized controlled trial of the effect of combined spinal-epidural analgesia on the success of external cephalic version for breech presentation.
【24h】

A randomized controlled trial of the effect of combined spinal-epidural analgesia on the success of external cephalic version for breech presentation.

机译:脊柱-硬膜外联合镇痛对外向头戴式臀位成功的影响的随机对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Improving the success of external cephalic version (ECV) for breech presentation may help avoid some cesarean deliveries. The results of randomized trials comparing the success of ECV with neuraxial analgesia compared to control are inconsistent. We hypothesized that combined spinal-epidural (CSE) analgesia would increase the success of ECV when compared with systemic opioid analgesia. METHODS: Parturients with singleton breech presentation (n=96) were randomized to receive CSE analgesia with bupivacaine 2.5mg and fentanyl 15 microg (CSE group) or intravenous fentanyl 50 microg (SYS group) before ECV attempt. The primary outcome was ECV success. RESULTS: The success rate of ECV was 47% with CSE and 31% in the SYS group (P=0.14). Subsequent vaginal delivery was 36% for CSE and 25% for SYS (P=0.27). Median [IQR] visual analog pain scores (0-100mm scale) were lower with CSE (3 [0-12]) compared to SYS analgesia (36 [16 to 54]) (P<0.005) and patient satisfaction (0-10 scale) was higher (CSE 10 [9 to 10] versus SYS 7 [4 to 9]) (P<0.005). There were no differences in fetal heart rate patterns, but median time to return to fetal heart rate reactivity after analgesia was shorter with CSE (13 [IQR 9-21] min) compared to the SYS group (39 [IQR 23-51] min) (P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in the rate of successful ECV or vaginal delivery with CSE compared to intravenous fentanyl analgesia. Pain scores were lower and satisfaction higher with CSE analgesia, and median time to fetal heart rate reactivity was shorter in the CSE group.
机译:背景:提高臀位外位头顶植入术(ECV)的成功率可能有助于避免剖宫产。比较ECV与神经痛镇痛效果与对照组比较的随机试验结果不一致。我们假设与全身性阿片类药物镇痛相比,联合硬膜外(CSE)镇痛会增加ECV的成功率。方法:在尝试尝试ECV之前,将具有单身臀位表现的产妇(n = 96)随机接受布比卡因2.5mg和芬太尼15 microg(CSE组)或静脉芬太尼50 microg(SYS组)的CSE镇痛。主要结果是ECV成功。结果:CSE的ECV成功率为47%,SYS组的ECV成功率为31%(P = 0.14)。 CSE和SYS的随后阴道分娩率分别为36%和25%(P = 0.27)。与SYS镇痛(36 [16至54])和患者满意度(0-10)相比,CSE(3 [0-12])的中位[IQR]视觉模拟疼痛评分(0-100mm评分)较低(P <0.005)规模)较高(CSE 10 [9至10]与SYS 7 [4至9])(P <0.005)。胎心率模式无差异,但与SYS组(39 [IQR 23-51]分钟)相比,CSE镇痛(13 [IQR 9-21]分钟)使镇痛后恢复胎心反应性的中位时间更短。 )(P = 0.02)。结论:与静脉芬太尼镇痛相比,CSE成功ECV或阴道分娩率没有差异。 CSE组的疼痛评分较低,对CSE镇痛的满意度较高,并且胎心率反应的中位时间较短。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号