首页> 外文期刊>International journal of nursing studies >Comparability of nurse staffing measures in examining the relationship between RN staffing and unit-acquired pressure ulcers: A unit-level descriptive, correlational study
【24h】

Comparability of nurse staffing measures in examining the relationship between RN staffing and unit-acquired pressure ulcers: A unit-level descriptive, correlational study

机译:护士人员配备措施在检查RN人员配备与单位获得性压疮之间关系方面的可比性:单位水平的描述性相关研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: Various staffing measures have been used in examining the relationship between nurse staffing and patient outcomes. Little research has been conducted to compare these measures based on their explanatory power as predictors of nursing-sensitive outcomes. In this study, both administrative and nurse-reported measures were examined. Administrative measures included registered nurse (RN) skill mix and three versions of nursing hours per patient day (HPPD); nurse-reported measures included RN-reported number of assigned patients and RN-perceived staffing adequacy. Objectives: To examine correlations among six nurse staffing measures and to compare their explanatory power in relation to unit-acquired pressure ulcers (UAPUs). Design: Descriptive, correlational study.Settings: 2397 nursing units in 409 U.S. acute care hospitals.Methods: Random-intercept logistic regression analyses were performed using 2011 data from a national database. Relationships between nurse staffing measures and UAPU occurrences were examined in eight models, each with one or more staffing measures as predictors. Characteristics of nursing units (RN workgroup education level and RN workgroup unit tenure) and hospitals (size, teaching status, and Magnet status) were included as control variables.Results: Two versions of HPPD (total nursing HPPD and RN HPPD) and RN skill mix were significantly correlated with RN-reported number of assigned patients (r range = -0.87 to -0.75). These staffing measures had weaker correlations with RN-perceived staffing adequacy (r range = 0.16 to 0.23). Of the six staffing variables, only RN-perceived staffing adequacy and RN skill mix were significantly associated with UAPU odds, the former being the better predictor.Conclusions: Although RN-perceived staffing adequacy was not highly correlated with administrative measures of HPPD and RN skill mix, it was the strongest predictor of UAPU occurrences. RN-perceived staffing adequacy can serve as a more appropriate measure of staffing for nursing-sensitive outcomes research than administrative measures, as it reflects relevant aspects of staffing and involves an implicit adjustment for patient acuity.
机译:背景:各种人员配备措施已用于检查护士人员配备与患者预后之间的关系。很少有研究根据其作为护理敏感结局指标的解释力来比较这些措施。在这项研究中,检查了行政措施和护士报告的措施。行政措施包括注册护士(RN)技能组合和每个患者每天的三种护理时间(HPPD);护士报告的措施包括RN报告的分配患者人数和RN认为的人员配备充足性。目的:检查六种护士配备措施之间的相关性,并比较其与单位获得性压疮(UAPU)的解释力。设计:描述性,相关性研究地点:美国409家急诊医院中的2397个护理室方法:采用国家数据库中的2011年数据进行随机拦截逻辑回归分析。在八个模型中检查了护士人员配备措施与UAPU发生之间的关系,每个模型都以一种或多种人员配备措施作为预测指标。作为控制变量,包括护理单位(RN工作组教育水平和RN工作组单位任期)和医院的特征(规模,教学状态和磁体状态)。结果:HPPD的两种版本(总护理HPPD和RN HPPD)和RN技能混合剂量与RN报告的分配患者数显着相关(r范围= -0.87至-0.75)。这些人员配备措施与RN认为的人员配备充足性之间的相关性较弱(r范围= 0.16至0.23)。在六个人员配置变量中,只有RN感知的人员配备和RN技能组合与UAPU几率显着相关,前者是更好的预测指标。结论:尽管RN感知的人员配备是否与HPPD和RN技能的管理措施没有高度相关性混合,它是UAPU发生率的最强预测因子。与行政管理措施相比,RN认为的人员配备充足性可以更适合作为护理敏感型结局研究的人员配备衡量标准,因为它反映了人员配备的相关方面并涉及对患者敏锐度的隐式调整。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号