首页> 外文期刊>International psychogeriatrics >Comparison of the burdens of family caregivers and foreign paid caregivers of the individuals with dementia
【24h】

Comparison of the burdens of family caregivers and foreign paid caregivers of the individuals with dementia

机译:痴呆症患者的家庭护理人员和外籍付费护理人员的负担比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: The caregiver burden on foreign paid caregivers (FPCs) is currently not well understood. This study identified predictors and differences in caregiver burden between FPCs and family caregivers who provided care for patients with dementia. Methods: We recruited 489 patients with dementia (diagnosed according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition) and used the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) and Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) Scale to assess their neuropsychiatric behavioral problems and severity of dementia. All caregivers [FPCs (n = 42) and family caregivers with (n = 42) and without (n = 447) FPCs] completed three questionnaires: the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI), the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D), and caregivers' knowledge of dementia (KD). To understand caregiver burden, we analyzed the correlations between ZBI and other variables and investigated the differences between family caregivers and FPCs. Results: NPI and CDR scores were higher among patients assisted by FPCs than among those whose families did not employ FPCs. Burdens were greater among family caregivers assisted by FPCs than among FPCs and family caregivers who were not assisted by FPCs. Family caregivers had greater knowledge of dementia than did FPCs. For family caregivers, CES-D scores (Spearman's r = 0.650; p < 0.01) and patients' NPI scores (Spearman's r = 0.471; p < 0.01) were correlated with caregiver burden. For FPCs, only CES-D scores (Spearman's r = 0.511; p < 0.01) were correlated with caregiver burden. A linear regression model showed that CES-D scores contributed most to caregiver burden in all groups [β = 0.560 (family caregivers without FPCs), 0.546 (family caregivers with FPCs), and 0.583 (FPCs); p < 0.005]. Conclusion: Both family caregivers and FPCs need emotional support. Adequate treatment to reduce the neuropsychiatric symptoms of patients with dementia might reduce the burden on family caregivers.
机译:背景:外国付费看护人(FPC)的看护人负担目前尚不清楚。这项研究确定了为痴呆症患者提供护理的FPC和家庭护理人员之间的预测因素和护理人员负担的差异。方法:我们招募了489例痴呆症患者(根据《精神疾病诊断和统计手册》第4版诊断),并使用神经精神病学量表(NPI)和临床痴呆症评分(CDR)量表来评估他们的神经精神病学行为问题和痴呆严重程度。所有看护人[FPC(n = 42)和有(n = 42)和没有(n = 447)FPC的家庭看护人]均完成了三份问卷:Zarit Burden访谈(ZBI),流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES- D),以及看护人的痴呆知识(KD)。为了了解护理人员的负担,我们分析了ZBI与其他变量之间的相关性,并调查了家庭护理人员和FPC之间的差异。结果:FPC辅助患者的NPI和CDR得分高于未使用FPC的家庭。在FPC协助下的家庭看护人的负担比FPC和未在FPC协助下的家庭看护人负担更大。与FPC相比,家庭护理人员对痴呆症的了解更多。对于家庭护理人员,CES-D评分(Spearman的r = 0.650; p <0.01)和患者的NPI评分(Spearman的r = 0.471; p <0.01)与护理人员的负担相关。对于FPC,只有CES-D评分(Spearman的r = 0.511; p <0.01)与照顾者的负担相关。线性回归模型显示,在所有组中,CES-D得分对照料者负担的影响最大[β= 0.560(无FPC的家庭照料者),0.546(有FPC的家庭照料者)和0.583(FPC); p <0.005]。结论:家庭看护人和FPC都需要情感支持。减轻痴呆患者神经精神症状的适当治疗可能会减轻家庭护理人员的负担。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号