...
首页> 外文期刊>International review of law and economics >Judicial review and political partisanship: Moving from consensual to majoritarian democracy
【24h】

Judicial review and political partisanship: Moving from consensual to majoritarian democracy

机译:司法审查和政治党派:从同意民主过渡到多数民主

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Due to the collapse of the party system during the mid-nineties, Italy represents an interesting case study to test the effects of a transition from a consensual to a majoritarian model of democracy on judicial behavior at the level of the Constitutional Court. Using a dataset of 972 cases of substantive judicial review (ricorsi in via principale) from 1985 to 2005, and proposing new measures of political alignment within constitutional review, we analyze the effect of a change in the political party system on judicial behavior. Our results show that political alignment is a stronger predictor of judicial decision making under majoritarian than consensual model of democracy. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:由于90年代中期政党制度的崩溃,意大利代表了一个有趣的案例研究,以检验从同意民主制向多数派民主制过渡对宪法法院司法行为的影响。运用1985年至2005年的972个实质性司法审查案例(通过委托人通过ricorsi)的数据集,并提出宪法审查中政治统一的新措施,我们分析了政党制度变化对司法行为的影响。我们的研究结果表明,与共识的民主模式相比,在多数制下,政治联盟是更强有力的司法决策预测指标。 (C)2015 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号