【24h】

Interventional Neuroradiology in the United Kingdom

机译:英国的介入神经放射学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The success and failures of Interventional Neuroradiology as a specialty in the UK reflect the strengths and weaknesses of its National Health Service (NHS). The lack of economic competition between the clinical specialties has resulted in an unusual degree of cooperation between surgeons and interventionalists in the clinical care of patients. Nearly all patients are treated under the NHS not by the private sector thus any suggestion that UK interventionalists are motivated primarily by financial greed demonstrates a lack of knowledge of the national service. The emphasis on social medicine leads to a cost effective, evidence based approach to patient management. This sometimes results in a conservative approach, with a distrust of new treatments until their value has been rigorously tested. An example of this is the use of intracranial stents in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. In a typical UK centre stents are used in 5% or fewer cases whereas in the US some centres are using stents in up to 60% of cases. Likewise the use of Onyx (MTI) for the treatment of aneurysms is virtually confined to one centre (Bristol).
机译:在英国,介入神经放射学作为一项专业的成败反映了其国家卫生服务局(NHS)的优缺点。临床专科之间缺乏经济竞争,导致外科医生和介入医师在患者临床护理方面的合作程度异常高。几乎所有患者都在NHS下接受治疗,而不是由私营部门接受治疗,因此,任何有关英国干预专家主要是出于经济贪婪动机的建议都表明缺乏对国民服务的了解。对社会医学的重视导致了一种成本有效,基于证据的患者管理方法。有时这会导致采取保守的方法,对新疗法不信任,直到对其价值进行严格测试为止。这方面的一个例子是在颅内动脉瘤的治疗中使用颅内支架。在典型的英国中心,使用支架的比例为5%或更少,而在美国,某些中心使用支架的比例高达60%。同样,使用y玛瑙(MTI)治疗动脉瘤实际上仅限于一个中心(布里斯托尔)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号