首页> 外文期刊>International psychogeriatrics >Predictors of quality of life ratings for persons with dementia simultaneously reported by patients and their caregivers: The Cache County (Utah) Study
【24h】

Predictors of quality of life ratings for persons with dementia simultaneously reported by patients and their caregivers: The Cache County (Utah) Study

机译:患者及其照护者同时报告的痴呆症患者生活质量等级的预测指标:凯奇县(犹他州)研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Quality of life (QOL) is frequently assessed in persons with dementia (PWD) through self- and/or proxy-report. Determinants of QOL ratings are multidimensional and may differ between patients and caregiver proxies. This study compared self- and proxy-reported QOL ratings in a population-based study of PWD and their caregivers, and examined the extent to which discrepancies in reports were associated with characteristics of the PWD. Methods: The sample consisted of 246 patient/caregiver dyads from the initial visit of the Cache County Dementia Progression Study, with both members of the dyad rating PWD QOL. PWD age, gender, cognitive impairment (Mini-Mental State Examination), neuropsychiatric symptoms (Neuropsychiatric Inventory; NPI), dementia severity (Clinical Dementia Rating), medical comorbidities (General Medical Health Rating), and functional impairment (Dementia Severity Rating Scale) were examined as correlates of self- and proxy-reported QOL ratings and the differences between the QOL reports. Results: Self- and proxy-reported PWD QOL ratings were only modestly correlated. Medical comorbidity was associated with self-report whereas NPI was associated with proxy-report. Dementia severity was associated with discrepancies in self- and proxy-report, with worse patient cognition associated with poorer proxy-reported QOL ratings. Conclusions: PWD self- and proxy-reported QOL ratings are associated with different variables. Discrepancies between PWD and caregiver perceptions of PWD QOL should be recognized, particularly in cases of more severe dementia.
机译:背景:痴呆症患者(PWD)经常通过自我报告和/或代理报告来评估生活质量(QOL)。 QOL等级的决定因素是多维的,患者和看护者代理之间可能会有所不同。这项研究在基于人群的PWD及其照护者研究中比较了自我和代理人报告的QOL评分,并检查了报告差异与PWD特征相关的程度。方法:该样本由Cache County痴呆症进展研究初次访视的246名患者/护理人员二联体组成,并且该二联体的成员均为PWD QOL。 PWD年龄,性别,认知障碍(小精神状态检查),神经精神症状(神经精神病学量表; NPI),痴呆严重程度(临床痴呆评分),医疗合并症(一般医疗健康评分)和功能障碍(痴呆严重程度评分表)被检查为自我和代理报告的QOL评分与QOL报告之间差异的相关性。结果:自我和代理人报告的PWD QOL评分仅适度相关。合并症与自我报告相关,而NPI与代理报告相关。痴呆症的严重程度与自我和代理报告中的差异有关,患者的认知较差与代理报告的QOL评分较差有关。结论:PWD自我和代理报告的QOL评分与不同变量相关。应当认识到PWD与护理人员对PWD QOL的理解之间的差异,尤其是在痴呆更严重的情况下。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号