首页> 外文期刊>Interventional cardiology. >Revascularization for stable ischemic heart disease: are there new parallels between percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting?
【24h】

Revascularization for stable ischemic heart disease: are there new parallels between percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting?

机译:稳定缺血性心脏病的血运重建:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和冠状动脉搭桥术之间是否有新的相似之处?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In patients with stable ischemic heart disease, revascularization is undertaken when optimal medical therapy fails, using percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) as appropriate and determined by the local Heart Team. For years, both revascularization strategies have been based on angiographically assessed anatomy alone. Now, using anatomy and physiology to guide intervention has been definitively shown to be superior to an anatomy-only approach in multicenter trials in PCI, documenting the importance of the regional myocardial perfusion status on outcomes. Since cath-lab physiologic evaluation is a pre-intervention assessment that impacts PCI outcomes, is regional myocardial perfusion important to CABG outcomes as well? Novel intraoperative imaging data are presented to document that in stable ischemic heart disease, competitive flow, graft patency and late mortality in CABG are influenced by the regional myocardial perfusion status of the grafted vessels. This new information should improve the outcomes of CABG as has occurred with PCI.
机译:对于患有稳定型缺血性心脏病的患者,当最佳药物治疗失败时进行血运重建,并酌情使用经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)或冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG),并由当地心脏小组决定。多年来,这两种血运重建策略都仅基于血管造影评估的解剖结构。现在,在PCI的多中心试验中,使用解剖学和生理学指导干预已被明确证明优于仅采用解剖学的方法,从而证明了局部心肌灌注状态对预后的重要性。由于导管实验室的生理评估是影响PCI结果的干预前评估,因此局部心肌灌注对CABG结果是否也很重要?提出了新的术中影像数据,以证明在稳定的缺血性心脏病中,CABG中的竞争性血流,移植物通畅性和晚期死亡率受移植血管局部心肌灌注状态的影响。与PCI一样,这种新信息应该可以改善CABG的预后。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号