首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Performability Engineering >Life Cycle Assessment of Maize Cropping under Different Fertilization Alternatives
【24h】

Life Cycle Assessment of Maize Cropping under Different Fertilization Alternatives

机译:不同施肥方式下玉米作物生命周期评价。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A Life Cycle Assessment was performed to compare the environmental impacts generated by Mediterranean maize crops (Southern Italy) under conventional management and C-friendly management aimed to preserve soil organic matter and reduce mineral N fertilizers application. Primary data from three fertilizing practices were processed: urea (CONV, conventional), compost (COM) and green manure (GMAN) distribution. Suitable comparisons among treatments were carried out by adopting the same system boundary (one hectare of cropped land) and functional unit (1kg_(maize dry matter)). Direct field emissions were calculated and the short term soil carbon storage, experimentally derived for COM and GMAN, was also included. Results indicate that the highest impacts are from chemical fertilizers over the background industrial supply chain. GMAN showed the lower environmental burdens, while soil protection strategy expected for COM appeared not sustainable, due to the low crop yield achieved.
机译:进行了生命周期评估,比较了常规管理和C友好管理下地中海玉米作物(意大利南部)产生的环境影响,旨在保护土壤有机质并减少矿物氮肥的施用。处理了三种施肥方法的主要数据:尿素(CONV,常规),堆肥(COM)和绿肥(GMAN)分布。通过采用相同的系统边界(一公顷耕地)和功能单位(1kg_(玉米干物质))对处理进行适当的比较。计算了直接田间排放量,还包括了通过实验得出的COM和GMAN的短期土壤碳储量。结果表明,对化学肥料的影响最大的是背景工业供应链。 GMAN表现出较低的环境负担,而COM预期的土壤保护策略由于获得的农作物产量低而显得不可持续。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号