...
首页> 外文期刊>British Poultry Science >Crop content in nutrient-restricted versus non-restricted organic laying hens with access to different forage vegetations
【24h】

Crop content in nutrient-restricted versus non-restricted organic laying hens with access to different forage vegetations

机译:营养限制型和非限制型有机蛋鸡的作物含量,可利用不同的草料植被

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

1. The purpose of this study was to evaluate how feed intake of organic layers varies according to type of forage vegetation available when hens are fed a normal concentrate for organic layers or a nutrient-restricted diet with whole wheat and oyster shells, assuming that the nutrient-restricted diet would reflect the capacity of the hens to forage. 2. Two 23-d experiments were arranged with chicken runs in a 2 x 2 factorial design with two types of complementary feed (concentrate with 184 g/kg dry matter (DM) crude protein vs whole wheat with 120 g/kg DM crude protein) and two types of forage vegetation (grass/clover vs a mixture of forbs in experiment 1 and grass/clover vs chicory in experiment 2): each experiment was carried out in three replications. 3. Twice during each experiment two hens from each run were slaughtered - two in the evening and two the following morning. Subsequently, the birds' crops were removed. Crop content was separated into 8 fractions. 4. For most feed items crop content was found to be significantly higher in the evening than in the morning. 5. Complementary feed significantly influenced the content of several feed items in the crop. In both experiments wheat-fed hens had a significantly higher amount of soil in the crops and a significantly lower amount of weed seeds compared to the concentrate-fed hens. Plant material and grit stone were significantly more abundant in wheat-fed hens only in experiment 2 and numerically more abundant in experiment 1, whereas the amount of oyster shells was significantly higher in wheat-fed hens in experiment 1 and numerically higher in experiment 2. 6. Type of forage itself only significantly influenced the amount of soil in the crops in experiment 1 and amount of seeds in experiment 2, since more soil was found in hens foraging on the mixed forbs and more seeds were found in the hens foraging on the chicory plots, respectively.
机译:1.这项研究的目的是评估当母鸡饲喂正常的有机层浓缩物或全麦和牡蛎壳的营养受限饮食时,有机层的采食量如何根据可用草料植被的类型而变化。限制营养的饮食将反映母鸡的觅食能力。 2.安排了两个23天的实验,以2 x 2因子设计的鸡肉运行,使用两种类型的辅助饲料(浓缩液含184 g / kg干物质(DM)粗蛋白,而全麦则含120 g / kg DM粗蛋白)和两种草料植被(实验1中的草/三叶草与杂草的混合物,实验2中的草/三叶草与菊苣的混合物):每个实验进行三次重复。 3.在每个实验中两次屠宰两次,每次屠宰一头母鸡-两只在晚上,第二只在早晨。随后,鸟的庄稼被去除了。作物含量分为8个部分。 4.对于大多数饲料项目,发现晚上的农作物含量明显高于早晨。 5.补充饲料显着影响了作物中几种饲料的含量。与浓缩饲喂母鸡相比,在这两个实验中,小麦饲喂母鸡的土壤土壤含量高得多,杂草种子含量低得多。仅在实验2中,小麦饲喂母鸡的植物材料和砂砾石含量显着更高,而在实验1中,数量丰富,而牡蛎壳的牡蛎壳数量在实验1中显着更高,而实验2在数值上更高。 6.饲草的种类本身仅显着影响实验1的农作物土壤和实验2的种子数量,因为在混合饲喂的母鸡中觅食的土壤更多,而在杂草中觅食的母鸡的种子更多。菊苣地块。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号