首页> 外文期刊>International journal of sports medicine >The effects of rear-wheel camber on maximal effort mobility performance in wheelchair athletes
【24h】

The effects of rear-wheel camber on maximal effort mobility performance in wheelchair athletes

机译:后轮外倾角对轮椅运动员最大努力运动性能的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This study examined the effect of rear-wheel camber on maximal effort wheelchair mobility performance. 14 highly trained wheelchair court sport athletes performed a battery of field tests in 4 standardised camber settings (15°, 18°, 20°, 24°) with performance analysed using a velocometer. 20m sprint times reduced in 18° (5.89±0.47s, P=0.011) and 20° camber (5.93±0.47s, P=0.030) compared with 24 (6.05±0.45s). Large effect sizes revealed that 18° camber enabled greater acceleration over the first 2 (r=0.53, 95% CI=0.004 to 0.239) and 3 (r=0.59, 95% CI=0.017 to 0.170) pushes compared with 24. Linear mobility times significantly improved (P≤0.05) in 15° (16.08±0.84s), 18° (16.06±0.97s) and 20° (16.22±0.84s) camber compared with 24° (16.62±1.10s). Although no statistically significant main effect of camber was revealed, large effect sizes (r=0.72, 95% CI=0.066 to 0.250) demonstrated that 18° camber reduced times taken to perform the manoeuvrability drill compared with 15°. It was concluded that 18° camber was the best performing setting investigated given its superior performance for both linear and non-linear aspects of mobility, whereas 24° camber impaired linear performance. This was likely to be due to the greater drag forces experienced. Subsequently, athletes would be recommended to avoid 24° camber and young or inexperienced athletes in particular may benefit from selecting 18° as a starting point due to its favourable performance for all aspects of mobility performance in the current study.
机译:这项研究检查了后轮外倾对最大努力轮椅移动性能的影响。 14位训练有素的轮椅场地运动运动员在4种标准外倾角设置(15°,18°,20°,24°)下进行了一系列现场测试,并使用速度计进行了性能分析。 20m的冲刺时间在18°(5.89±0.47s,P = 0.011)和20°弯度(5.93±0.47s,P = 0.030)中减少了24(6.05±0.45s)。较大的效果范围显示,与24个推力相比,前两个推力(r = 0.53,95%CI = 0.004至0.239)和3个(r = 0.59,95%CI = 0.017至0.170)的推力为18°时,加速度更大。与24°(16.62±1.10s)相比,在15°(16.08±0.84s),18°(16.06±0.97s)和20°(16.22±0.84s)外倾角中的倍数显着改善(P≤0.05)。尽管没有显示出弯度的统计显着主效应,但较大的效应尺寸(r = 0.72,95%CI = 0.066至0.250)表明,与15°相比,18°弯度减少了执行机动演习所需的时间。结论是,考虑到18°外倾角在线性和非线性运动性方面的优越性能,它是研究性能最好的设置,而24°外倾角则损害了线性性能。这可能是由于经历了更大的阻力。随后,建议运动员避免24°弯度,尤其是年轻或没有经验的运动员可能会因选择18°作为起始点而受益,因为该角度在当前研究中对移动性表现的各个方面均表现良好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号