首页> 外文期刊>International journal of sport nutrition and exercise metabolism >Ergogenic Effects of Caffeine Consumption in a 3-min All-Out Arm Crank Test in Paraplegic and Tetraplegic Compared With Able-Bodied Individuals
【24h】

Ergogenic Effects of Caffeine Consumption in a 3-min All-Out Arm Crank Test in Paraplegic and Tetraplegic Compared With Able-Bodied Individuals

机译:与健康人相比,在截瘫和四肢瘫痪和三肢瘫痪的3分钟全力进行曲柄试验中咖啡因消耗的人为产生的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of our study was to investigate the effect of caffeine supplementation on 3-min all-out arm crank exercise performance in paraplegic (P) and tetraplegic (T) compared with able-bodied (AB) participants. A placebo-controlled, randomized, crossover, and double-blind study design was chosen to investigate the differences between caffeine (CAF) and placebo (PLC). In total, 34 healthy, trained participants were tested. Seventeen were AB (median [minimum; maximum] VO2peak: 33.9 mL/min/kg [23.6; 57.6]), 10 were P (VO2peak: 34.4 mL/min/kg [19.5; 48.8]), and 7 were T (VO2peak: 13.6 mL/min/kg [8.6; 16.3]). All participants performed two 3-min all-out tests on an arm crank ergometer following the ingestion of either PLC or CAF. Power output parameters, plasma caffeine (PC), epinephrine (EPI), and norepinephrine (NOR) concentrations were assessed. CAF significantly increased average power over the first 30 s (p =.028) and 60 s (p =.005) in P, but not in T (p = .61; p = .87) nor in AB (p = .25; p = .44). Peak power was increased in the CAF trial in AB (+46 W) as well as in P (+21 W) but was not significantly different from PLC (AB: p = .10; P: p = .17). PC significantly increased in all groups (AB: p = .002; P: p =.005; T: p = .018) whereas EPI showed a significant increase only in AB (p = .002) and in P (p = .018). NOR increased significantly in AB (p = .018) but did not increase in the other groups. Caffeine seems to enhance short-duration exercise performance in P. In contrast, T showed a high interindividual variability and overall no ergogenic effect was detected in this group.
机译:我们研究的目的是调查与健壮(AB)参与者相比,补充咖啡因对截瘫(P)和四肢瘫痪(T)的3分钟全面曲柄运动表现的影响。选择安慰剂对照,随机,交叉和双盲研究设计来研究咖啡因(CAF)和安慰剂(PLC)之间的差异。总共测试了34名健康,训练有素的参与者。 AB为17(中位数[最小;最大] VO2peak:33.9 mL / min / kg [23.6; 57.6]),10为P(VO2peak:34.4 mL / min / kg [19.5; 48.8]),7为T(VO2peak :13.6mL / min / kg [8.6; 16.3]。摄入PLC或CAF后,所有参与者均对曲柄测功机进行了两次3分钟的全面测试。评估了功率输出参数,血浆咖啡因(PC),肾上腺素(EPI)和去甲肾上腺素(NOR)的浓度。在P的前30 s(p = .028)和60 s(p = .005)中,CAF显着提高了平均功率,但在T(p = .61; p = .87)和AB(p =。 25; p = 0.44)。在CAF试验中,AB(+46 W)和P(+21 W)的峰值功率均增加,但与PLC的峰值功率没有显着差异(AB:p = .10; P:p = .17)。 PC在所有组中均显着增加(AB:p = .002; P:p = .005; T:p = .018),而EPI仅在AB(p = .002)和P(p =。 018)。 AB组的NOR显着增加(p = .018),而其他组则没有。咖啡因似乎可以增强P的短时运动能力。相反,T显示出较高的个体差异,并且在该组中总体上未检测到人为产生作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号