首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics >Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for the treatment of oropharyngeal carcinoma: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center experience.
【24h】

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for the treatment of oropharyngeal carcinoma: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center experience.

机译:调强放射疗法治疗口咽癌:斯隆-凯特琳纪念癌症中心纪念馆的经验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To review the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center's experience in using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for the treatment of oropharyngeal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between September 1998 and June 2004, 50 patients with histologically confirmed cancer of the oropharynx underwent IMRT at our institution. There were 40 men and 10 women with a median age of 56 years (range, 28-78 years). The disease was Stage I in 1 patient (2%), Stage II in 3 patients (6%), Stage III in 7 (14%), and Stage IV in 39 (78%). Forty-eight patients (96%) received definitive treatment, and 2 (4%) were treated in the postoperative adjuvant setting. Concurrent chemotherapy was used in 43 patients (86%). Patients were treated using three different IMRT approaches: 76% dose painting, 18% concomitant boost with IMRT in both am and pm deliveries, and 6% concomitant boost with IMRT only in pm delivery. Regardless of the approach, the average prescription dose to the gross tumor planning target volume was 70 Gy, while the average dose delivered to the subclinical volume was 59.4 Gy in the dose painting group and 54 Gy in the concomitant boost group. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding tubes (PEGs) were placed before the beginning of treatment in 84% of the patients. Acute and late toxicity were graded according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) radiation morbidity scoring criteria. Toxicity was also evaluated using subjective criteria such as the presence of esophageal stricture, and the need for PEG usage. The local progression-free, regional progression-free, and distant metastases-free rates, and overall survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Three patients had persistent locoregional disease after treatment. The 2-year estimates of local progression-free, regional progression-free, distant metastases-free, and overall survival were 98%, 88%, 84%, and 98%, respectively. The worst acute mucositis experienced was Grade 1 in 4 patients (8%), Grade 2 in 27 (54%), and Grade 3 in 19 (38%). Xerostomia decreased with increasing time interval from the end of radiotherapy, and among the patients with at least 9 months of follow-up there was 67% Grade 0-1 and 33% Grade 2 toxicity. Of the 42 patients who required upfront PEG placement, 6 were still using PEG for nutrition at the time of this analysis. Three patients had cervical esophageal strictures, and of these, 1 was still PEG dependent 1 year after treatment. Two of these patients were treated with the IMRT concomitant boost am and pm approach, whereas the other was treated with the dose painting technique. CONCLUSIONS: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy achieved encouraging local control rates in patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma. Treatment toxicity was acceptable even in the setting of concurrent chemotherapy. Long-term follow-up is needed to confirm these preliminary findings.
机译:目的:回顾斯隆-凯特琳纪念癌症中心在使用强度调制放射疗法(IMRT)治疗口咽癌方面的经验。方法和材料:在1998年9月至2004年6月之间,我们机构对50例经组织学证实为口咽癌的患者进行了IMRT。男40例,女10例,中位年龄56岁(范围28-78岁)。该疾病为I期1例(2%),II期3例(6%),III期7例(14%)和IV期39例(78%)。 48例患者(96%)得到了明确的治疗,其中2例(4%)在术后辅助治疗中接受了治疗。 43例(86%)患者接受了同时化疗。使用三种不同的IMRT方法对患者进行了治疗:76%的剂量涂装,上午和下午分娩中18%的IMRT伴随增强,仅下午分娩中的IMRT 6%伴随增强。无论采用哪种方法,针对总体肿瘤规划目标体积的平均处方剂量为70 Gy,而在剂量涂抹组中,交付至亚临床体积的平均剂量为59.4 Gy,在同时进行的加强治疗组中为54 Gy。在开始治疗之前,在84%的患者中放置了经皮内窥镜胃造口术饲管(PEGs)。急性和晚期毒性根据放射治疗肿瘤学组(RTOG)放射发病率评分标准进行分级。还使用主观标准(例如食管狭窄的存在和是否需要使用PEG)来评估毒性。使用Kaplan-Meier方法计算局部无进展,区域无进展和远处无转移率以及总生存期。结果:三名患者在治疗后均患有持续性局部疾病。对局部无进展,无区域进展,无远处转移和总生存的2年估计分别为98%,88%,84%和98%。经历过的最严重的急性粘膜炎是4名患者的1级(8%),27名患者的2级(54%)和19名3级(38%)。自放疗结束以来,口干症随着时间间隔的增加而降低,并且在至少随访9个月的患者中,0-1级为67%,2级为33%。在进行前瞻性PEG置入的42位患者中,有6位在分析时仍在使用PEG进行营养。 3例患有颈段食管狭窄,其中1例在治疗1年后仍依赖PEG。这些患者中有2例接受了IMRT伴随的am和pm加强免疫治疗,而另一例接受了剂量涂装技术治疗。结论:调强放射治疗在口咽癌患者中取得了令人鼓舞的局部控制率。即使在同时进行化疗的情况下,治疗毒性也是可以接受的。需要长期随访以确认这些初步发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号