首页> 外文期刊>International journal of stroke: official journal of the International Stroke Society >Preceding intravenous thrombolysis facilitates endovascular mechanical recanalization in large intracranial artery occlusion
【24h】

Preceding intravenous thrombolysis facilitates endovascular mechanical recanalization in large intracranial artery occlusion

机译:先前的静脉溶栓治疗有助于颅内大动脉闭塞的血管内机械再通

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background and aims Acute occlusions of the large intracranial arteries are relatively resistant to intravenous thrombolysis. Therefore, multimodal approaches combining intravenous thrombolysis with endovascular mechanical recanalization are increasingly being applied. In this setting, intravenous thrombolysis may facilitate subsequent mechanical thrombectomy. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed the influence of intravenous thrombolysis on net intervention time in subsequent endovascular mechanical recanalization. Methods In this retrospective single-center analysis, we compared net intervention time with and without preceding intravenous thrombolysis in patients treated by endovascular mechanical recanalization between 01/2003 and 06/2010. The net intervention time was defined as the interval between the onset of endovascular thrombus manipulation and successful vessel recanalization. Results We identified 65 eligible patients, 35 of whom were treated by intravenous thrombolysis before mechanical therapy. Recanalization was achieved in 26 patients with (74%) and 23 patients without preceding intravenous thrombolysis (77%). In the case of successful recanalization, the net intervention time was significantly shorter in patients with preceding intravenous thrombolysis (24·8 ± 22·8 vs. 44·2 ± 40·5min; P0·05). This difference remained significant after restricting the analysis to the patients treated by the Penumbra Stroke System
机译:背景和目的颅内大动脉的急性闭塞对静脉溶栓治疗具有相对的抵抗力。因此,越来越多地采用将静脉内溶栓与血管内机械再通结合的多峰方法。在这种情况下,静脉溶栓可能会促进随后的机械血栓切除术。为了验证该假设,我们分析了静脉溶栓对随后血管内机械再通的净介入时间的影响。方法在本回顾性单中心分析中,我们比较了01/2003年至06/2010年间接受血管内机械再通治疗的患者在有无静脉溶栓治疗的情况下的净干预时间。净介入时间定义为血管内血栓开始发作与血管再通成功之间的时间间隔。结果我们确定了65例合格患者,其中35例在机械治疗前接受了静脉溶栓治疗。 26例患者(74%)和23例未进行静脉内溶栓治疗的患者实现了再通。在成功进行再通的情况下,先前进行静脉溶栓的患者的净介入时间明显缩短(24·8±22·8 vs. 44·2±40·5min; P <0·05)。在将分析局限于Penumbra Stroke System治疗的患者之后,这种差异仍然很明显

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号