首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics >Accuracy of ultrasound-based image guidance for daily positioning of the upper abdomen: an online comparison with cone beam CT.
【24h】

Accuracy of ultrasound-based image guidance for daily positioning of the upper abdomen: an online comparison with cone beam CT.

机译:基于超声的图像指导在上腹部日常定位中的准确性:与锥形束CT的在线比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: Image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy can improve protection of organs at risk when large abdominal target volumes are irradiated. We estimated the daily positioning accuracy of ultrasound-based image guidance for abdominal target volumes by a direct comparison of daily imaging obtained with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Daily positioning (n = 83 positionings) of 15 patients was completed by using ultrasound guidance after an initial CBCT was obtained. Residual error after ultrasound was estimated by comparison with a second CBCT. Ultrasound image quality was visually rated using a scale of 1 to 4. RESULTS: Of 15 patients, 7 patients had good sonographic imaging quality, 5 patients had satisfactory sonographic quality, and 3 patients were excluded because of unsatisfactory sonographic quality. When image quality was good, residual errors after ultrasound were -0.1 +/- 3.11 mm in the x direction (left-right; group systematic error M = -0.09 mm; standard deviation [SD] of systematic error, Sigma = 1.37 mm; SD of the random error, sigma = 2.99 mm), 0.93 +/- 4.31 mm in the y direction (superior-inferior, M = 1.12 mm; Sigma = 2.96 mm; sigma = 3.39 mm), and 0.71 +/- 3.15 mm in the z direction (anteroposterior; M = 1.01 mm; Sigma = 2.46 mm; sigma = 2.24 mm). For patients with satisfactory image quality, residual error after ultrasound was -0.6 +/- 5.26 mm in the x (M = 0.07 mm; Sigma = 5.67 mm; sigma = 4.86 mm), 1.76 +/- 4.92 mm in the y (M = 3.54 mm; Sigma = 4.1 mm; sigma = 5.29 mm), and 1.19 +/- 4.75 mm in the z (M = 0.82 mm; Sigma = 2.86 mm; sigma = 3.05 mm) directions. CONCLUSIONS: In patients from whom good sonographic image quality could be obtained, ultrasound improved daily positioning accuracy. In the case of satisfactory image quality, ultrasound guidance improved accuracy compared to that of skin marks only minimally. If sonographic image quality was unsatisfactory, daily CBCT scanning improved treatment accuracy distinctly over that of ultrasound. Use of daily ultrasound or CBCT imaging can help to reduce PTV margins and protect organs at risk compared to the use of skin mark-based positioning.
机译:目的:图像引导下的强度调制放射疗法可以提高对大腹部靶区照射时处于危险中的器官的保护。我们通过直接比较使用锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)获得的每日成像,估计了基于腹部腹部目标体积的超声图像引导的每日定位精度。方法和材料:获得初始CBCT后,通过超声引导完成15例患者的每日定位(n = 83个定位)。通过与第二个CBCT进行比较,估计出超声后的残留误差。结果:超声图像质量的评分为1-4。结果:15例患者中,有7例超声检查图像质量良好,有5例超声检查图像质量良好,有3例由于超声图像质量不佳而被排除在外。当图像质量良好时,超声后的残留误差在x方向上为-0.1 +/- 3.11 mm(左右;组系统误差M = -0.09 mm;系统误差的标准偏差[SD],Sigma = 1.37 mm;随机误差的SD,sigma = 2.99 mm),y方向上为0.93 +/- 4.31 mm(上下),M = 1.12 mm; Sigma = 2.96 mm; sigma = 3.39 mm),和0.71 +/- 3.15 mm在z方向(前后; M = 1.01 mm; Sigma = 2.46 mm; sigma = 2.24 mm)。对于图像质量令人满意的患者,超声后的残留误差在x处为-0.6 +/- 5.26 mm(M = 0.07 mm; Sigma = 5.67 mm; sigma = 4.86 mm),在y处为1.76 +/- 4.92 mm(M = 3.54mm;σ= 4.1mm;σ= 5.29mm),以及z方向上的1.19 +/- 4.75mm(M = 0.82mm;σ= 2.86mm;σ= 3.05mm)。结论:对于能够获得良好超声图像质量的患者,超声可以提高每日定位的准确性。在令人满意的图像质量的情况下,与皮肤痕迹相比,超声引导的准确性提高很小。如果超声图像质量不能令人满意,则每日CBCT扫描显着提高了超声治疗的准确性。与使用基于皮肤标记的定位相比,每天使用超声波或CBCT成像可以帮助减少PTV边缘并保护处于危险状态的器官。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号