...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of rehabilitation research: Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschungon >Comparison of the effects of mirror therapy and electromyography-triggered neuromuscular stimulation on hand functions in stroke patients: a pilot study
【24h】

Comparison of the effects of mirror therapy and electromyography-triggered neuromuscular stimulation on hand functions in stroke patients: a pilot study

机译:镜像疗法和肌电图触发的神经肌肉刺激对中风患者手功能的影响比较:一项初步研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

To determine the effectiveness of mirror therapy and electromyography (EMG)-triggered neuromuscular stimulation on improvement of functions of the upper extremity in patients with subacute stroke in comparison with conventional therapy as well as to evaluate the advantage of each treatment over another, we conducted a prospective, randomized, and controlled trial involving 24 patients with ischemic stroke. The mean age and mean time since stroke of the patients were 58.79 +/- 11.49 years and 5.25 +/- 2.25 months. Patients were assigned randomly to a mirror therapy group (MT group, n= 9), which consisted of therapy with a mirror box 5 days/week, 30 min/day, for 3 weeks, an electrostimulation group (ES group, n= 7), which consisted of therapy with EMG-triggered stimulation (EMG-stim) of similar duration and frequency of treatment as the MT group, and a control group (n= 8). All the groups received conventional physiotherapy for the same period as the MT group. Patients in the MT group practiced their therapy at home after supervised sessions. The Fugl-Meyer scores of the upper extremity, grip force, wrist extension, and Box and Block Test were evaluated at baseline, after treatment, and at 3 months after the treatment. All of these measures were evaluated by a blinded researcher. We found that there was no significant improvement in wrist extension range and grip force in control group. The MT and EMG-stim were effective in increasing the Fugl-Meyer motor scale for upper extremity (MT group: P< 0.01), increasing wrist extension range, grip force, and hand dexterity determined by the Box and Block Test (MT group and ES group P< 0.05). Furthermore, hand skills were increased significantly in the MT group compared with the ES group at the follow-up assessment (P< 0.05). This pilot study suggested that MT was more efficient in improving motor performance than physiotherapy alone. Also, MT may be more useful in improving the hand skills compared with EMG-stim. We assume that this difference might be related to the feasibility of maintenance of MT at home. Copyright (C) 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:为了确定镜疗法和肌电图(EMG)触发的神经肌肉刺激与传统疗法相比对亚急性中风患者上肢功能改善的有效性,并评估每种疗法相对于另一种疗法的优势,我们进行了一项一项涉及24例缺血性中风患者的前瞻性,随机和对照试验。患者中风的平均年龄和平均时间为58.79 +/- 11.49岁和5.25 +/- 2.25个月。将患者随机分配到镜治疗组(MT组,n = 9),该组包括使用电镜刺激箱(5天/周,30分钟/天,3周/ 3天),电刺激组(ES组,n = 7)。 ),其中包括采用与MT组相似的治疗时间和频率的EMG触发刺激(EMG-stim)和对照组(n = 8)。所有组均与MT组在同一时期接受常规理疗。 MT组的患者在经过监督的疗程后在家中进行治疗。在基线,治疗后和治疗后3个月评估上肢,握力,腕部伸展和Box and Block测试的Fugl-Meyer评分。所有这些措施均由盲人研究人员进行评估。我们发现对照组的手腕伸展范围和握力没有明显改善。 MT和EMG刺激有效地增加了上肢的Fugl-Meyer运动量表(MT组:P <0.01),增加了手腕伸展范围,握力和手灵巧度(通过Box and Block Test(MT组和ES组P <0.05)。此外,在随访评估中,与ES组相比,MT组的手技能显着提高(P <0.05)。这项初步研究表明,MT比单纯的物理疗法更有效地改善运动表现。此外,与EMG刺激相比,MT在改善手部技巧方面可能更有用。我们假设这种差异可能与在家中维护MT的可行性有关。版权所有(C)2016 Wolters Kluwer Health,Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号