...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Reliability and Safety >Inverse reliability measures and reliability-based design optimisation
【24h】

Inverse reliability measures and reliability-based design optimisation

机译:逆可靠性措施和基于可靠性的设计优化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Several inverse reliability measures (e.g. Probabilistic Performance Measure (PPM) and Probabilistic Sufficiency Factor (PSF)) that are essentially equivalent have been introduced in recent years as measures of safety. The different names for essentially the same measure reflect the fact that different researchers focused on different advantages of inverse measures. These advantages include improved computational efficiency of Reliability-Based Design Optimisation (RBDO), accuracy in Response Surface Approximations (RSAs) and easy estimates of resources needed for achieving target safety levels. This paper surveys these inverse measures and describes their advantages compared with the direct measures of safety such as probability of failure and reliability index. Methods to compute the inverse measures are also described. RBDO with inverse measure is demonstrated with a beam design example.
机译:近年来,作为安全性措施,已经引入了几项本质上等效的逆可靠性措施(例如,概率性能度量(PPM)和概率充分性因子(PSF))。本质上相同度量的不同名称反映了这样一个事实,即不同的研究人员专注于逆度量的不同优势。这些优势包括提高了基于可靠性的设计优化(RBDO)的计算效率,响应面近似(RSA)的准确性以及对实现目标安全级别所需资源的轻松估算。本文对这些反措施进行了调查,并描述了它们与直接安全措施(如故障概率和可靠性指标)相比的优势。还介绍了计算逆度量的方法。反向设计的RBDO通过梁设计示例进行了演示。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号