...
首页> 外文期刊>American journal of medical genetics, Part A >The outcome of diagnostic studies on the etiology of mental retardation: considerations on the classification of the causes.
【24h】

The outcome of diagnostic studies on the etiology of mental retardation: considerations on the classification of the causes.

机译:关于智力低下病因的诊断研究的结果:关于病因分类的考虑。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In the different studies on the etiology of mental retardation (MR), a diagnosis has been reached in a remarkably variable proportion of cases. This is due to differences in methodology (population examined, age of the patients, degree of MR, time and protocol of investigation, expertise), method of classification (according to timing of defect, type of defect or both), and, in particular the different use of the term diagnosis. The latter varies with the employed criteria (causal vs. pathomorphological vs. pathophysiological), with the degree of exclusiveness (single cause vs. multifactorial/predisposing background factors) and particularly with the degree of implied certainty (definite vs. provisional). All these factors contribute to the fact that in general, the results of different clinical studies on the etiology of MR are not strictly comparable and cannot be pooled. A dynamic method of classification is proposed which combines both time of occurrence and type of defect, and includes the degree of certainty of a diagnosis. The method allows identification of patients which need follow-up and reconsideration of their cases.
机译:在有关智力低下(MR)病因的不同研究中,已经在相当多的病例中做出了诊断。这是由于以下方法的差异:方法(检查的人群,患者的年龄,MR的程度,检查的时间和方案,专业知识),分类方法(根据缺陷的时间,缺陷的类型或两者)的不同而引起的。诊断一词的不同用法。后者随所采用的标准(因果关系,病理形态学与病理生理学),排他性程度(单因与多因素/易感背景因素),尤其是隐含确定性的程度(确定性与临时性)而变化。所有这些因素导致了这样一个事实,即一般而言,关于MR病因的不同临床研究结果不能严格比较,因此无法汇总。提出了一种动态分类方法,该方法将出现的时间和缺陷的类型结合在一起,并包括诊断的确定程度。该方法可以识别需要随访和重新考虑其病例的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号