...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of older people nursing >What are the relative merits of interventions used to reduce the occurrences of disruptive vocalisation in persons with dementia? - a systematic review
【24h】

What are the relative merits of interventions used to reduce the occurrences of disruptive vocalisation in persons with dementia? - a systematic review

机译:用于减少痴呆症患者发声破坏的干预措施的相对优点是什么? -系统审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Introduction: Dementia is a major health issue, and many people who have the progressive disease express disruptive vocalisation. These behaviours place large burdens on carers, family and on the individual themselves. Background: This systematic review explored the use of interventions that could be used within practice to reduce the occurrences of disruptive vocalisation in people with dementia. Methods: Three online databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE and EMBASE) were searched for papers published after 1997 against two concept criteria of dementia and disruptive vocalisation. Any person diagnosed with dementia or suspected of having dementia symptoms were included identifying any interventions. Studies were appraised and data extracted using the Joanna Briggs Institute frameworks. Results: This systematic review identified eight relevant papers for inclusion, and these assessed the implementation of eight separate interventions that could be used within practice. Three interventions were found to be supported by statistically significant research: a staff training programme, a behavioural management technique using cue cards and hand massage. Conclusion: The overall conclusion is that the evidence base is insufficient to make recommendations for practice. However, the studies gave some indication of how research and practice might develop in this area. In particular, five elements were identified that appear to promote the best patient outcomes. These include making sure interventions are person-centred, individualised, adaptable, with the use of multiple approaches, carried out by staff trained in the identification of disruptive vocalisation and ways to avoid triggering these behaviours. Implications for practice: Triggers which lead to older people with dementia expressing disruptive vocalisation should be identified. Multiple individualised interventions should be used to reduce the occurrences of the disruptive vocalisation.
机译:简介:痴呆症是一个主要的健康问题,许多患有进行性疾病的人会表达破坏性声音。这些行为给护理人员,家庭和个人本身带来了沉重负担。背景:本系统综述探讨了可在实践中使用的干预措施的使用,以减少痴呆症患者发声破坏的发生。方法:搜索三个在线数据库(CINAHL,MEDLINE和EMBASE),以查找针对痴呆和破坏性发声这两个概念标准的1997年之后发表的论文。任何被诊断为痴呆症或怀疑患有痴呆症症状的人均应包括在内,以识别任何干预措施。使用乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的框架对研究进行评估并提取数据。结果:本系统评价确定了八篇相关的论文供纳入,并评估了可在实践中使用的八种单独干预措施的实施情况。统计意义上的重大研究发现支持三种干预措施:员工培训计划,使用提示卡和手部按摩的行为管理技术。结论:总体结论是,证据基础不足以为实践提出建议。但是,这些研究表明了该领域的研究和实践将如何发展。特别是,确定了可以促进最佳患者预后的五个因素。这些措施包括确保干预措施以人为本,个性化,适应性强,并采用多种方法,由受过识别破坏性发声的训练的工作人员进行,并采取避免触发这些行为的方法。对实践的意义:应该识别导致老年痴呆症患者表达破坏性发声的诱因。应使用多种个性化干预措施,以减少破坏性发声的发生。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号