...
首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Radiology >Comparison of effective doses obtained from dose-area product and air kerma measurements in interventional radiology.
【24h】

Comparison of effective doses obtained from dose-area product and air kerma measurements in interventional radiology.

机译:在介入放射学中从剂量面积积和空气比释动能测量获得的有效剂量的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this study, measurements of dose-area product (DAP) and entrance dose were carried out simultaneously in a sample of 162 adult patients who underwent different interventional examinations. Effective doses for each measurement technique were estimated using the conversion factors that have been determined for specific X-ray views in a mathematical phantom. Exposure conditions used in clinical practice never match these theoretical models exactly, and deviations from the assumed standard conditions cause uncertainties in effective dose estimations. Higher effective dose values are found if the air kerma results are used rather than DAP readings, both for patient and Rando phantom studies. Comparison of DAP, fluoroscopy times and skin doses were made with published data. DAP measurement for the effective dose calculation and thermoluminescent dosimeter for the skin dose estimates are found to be the most reliable methods for patient dosimetry.
机译:在这项研究中,在接受不同干预检查的162名成年患者的样本中,同时进行了剂量面积乘积(DAP)和入院剂量的测量。使用为数学体模中的特定X射线视图确定的转换因子,估算每种测量技术的有效剂量。临床实践中使用的接触条件永远无法与这些理论模型完全匹配,与假定标准条件的偏差会导致有效剂量估算的不确定性。如果对患者和Rando体模研究均使用空气比释动能结果而非DAP读数,则会发现较高的有效剂量值。 DAP,透视检查时间和皮肤剂量与已发表的数据进行了比较。发现用于有效剂量计算的DAP测量和用于皮肤剂量估计的热辐射剂量计是用于患者剂量测定的最可靠方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号