首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Radiology >Discrimination between neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions in cirrhotic liver using contrast-enhanced ultrasound
【24h】

Discrimination between neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions in cirrhotic liver using contrast-enhanced ultrasound

机译:超声造影鉴别肝硬化中肿瘤性和非肿瘤性病变

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objectives: To assess the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from non-neoplastic lesion in cirrhotic liver in comparison with baseline ultrasound. Methods: A total of 147 nodules (diameter ≤5.0 cm) in 133 cirrhotic patients (mean age ± standard deviation: 52±13 years, range 20-82 years; gender: 111 males and 22 females) were examined with CEUS. There were 116 HCCs, 26 macroregenerative nodules and 5 high-grade dysplastic nodules. CEUS was performed with a real-time contrast-specific mode and a sulphur hexafluoride-filled microbubble contrast agent. Results: Hypervascularity was observed in 94.8% (110/116) HCCs, 3.8% (1/26) macroregenerative nodules and 60.0% (3/5) high-grade dysplastic nodules during arterial phase on CEUS. Detection rates of typical vascular pattern (i.e. hypervascularity during arterial phase and subsequent washout) in HCCs with a diameter of ≤2.0 cm, 2.1-3.0cm and 3.1-5.0 cm were 69.2% (27/39), 97.1% (33/34) and 100.0% (43/43), respectively. CEUS significantly improved the sensitivity [88.8% (103/116) vs 37.1% (43/ 116), p<0.001], negative predictive value [70.5% (31/44) vs 31.5% (29/92), p<0.001], and accuracy [91.2% (134/147) vs 49.0% (72/147), p<0.001] in differentiating HCCs from non-neoplastic lesions when compared with baseline ultrasound. However, the sensitivity and accuracy of CEUS for HCCs ≤2.0cm in diameter were significantly lower than those for HCCs of 2.1-3.0cm and 3.1-5.0 cm in diameter. Conclusions: CEUS improves diagnostic performance in differentiating HCCs from non-neoplastic nodules in cirrhotic patients compared with baseline ultrasound. Diagnosis of HCCs ≤2.0cm diameter by CEUS is still a clinical concern, and thus needs further investigation.
机译:目的:与基线超声相比,评估超声造影(CEUS)在区分肝硬化性肝细胞癌(HCC)和非肿瘤性病变中的价值。方法:对133例肝硬化患者(平均年龄±标准差:52±13岁,范围20-82岁;性别:111例男性和22例女性)的147个结节(直径≤5.0cm)进行了CEUS检查。有116个肝癌,26个大体再生结节和5个高级发育异常结节。 CEUS是采用实时对比特定模式和六氟化硫填充的微气泡对比剂进行的。结果:在CEUS的动脉期,在94.8%(110/116)的HCC,3.8%(1/26)的大再生性结节和60.0%(3/5)的高级别增生性结节中观察到了超血管。直径≤2.0cm,2.1-3.0cm和3.1-5.0 cm的HCC中典型血管模式(即动脉期和随后的冲洗过程中的高血管形成)的检出率分别为69.2%(27/39),97.1%(33/34) )和100.0%(43/43)。 CEUS显着提高了敏感性[88.8%(103/116)对37.1%(43/116),p <0.001],阴性预测值[70.5%(31/44)对31.5%(29/92),p <0.001 ],与基线超声相比,区分HCC与非肿瘤性病变的准确性[91.2%(134/147)对49.0%(72/147),p <0.001]。但是,CEUS对直径≤2.0cm的HCC的敏感性和准确性明显低于直径在2.1-3.0cm和3.1-5.0 cm的HCC。结论:与基线超声检查相比,CEUS可改善肝硬化患者与非肿瘤性结节的HCC鉴别诊断性能。 CEUS对直径≤2.0cm的肝癌的诊断仍是临床关注的问题,因此需要进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号