首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Cardiology >Multiparametric comparison of CARvedilol, vs. NEbivolol, vs. BIsoprolol in moderate heart failure: The CARNEBI trial
【24h】

Multiparametric comparison of CARvedilol, vs. NEbivolol, vs. BIsoprolol in moderate heart failure: The CARNEBI trial

机译:卡维地洛,尼比洛尔,比索洛尔在中度心力衰竭中的多参数比较:CARNEBI试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background Several β-blockers, with different pharmacological characteristics, are available for heart failure (HF) treatment. We compared Carvedilol (β1-β2-α-blocker), Bisoprolol (β1-blocker), and Nebivolol (β1-blocker, NO-releasing activity). Methods Sixty-one moderate HF patients completed a cross-over randomized trial, receiving, for 2 months each, Carvedilol, Nebivolol, Bisoprolol (25.6 ± 12.6, 5.0 ± 2.4 and 5.0 ± 2.4 mg daily, respectively). At the end of each period, patients underwent: clinical evaluation, laboratory testing, echocardiography, spirometry (including total DLCO and membrane diffusion), O2/CO 2 chemoreceptor sensitivity, constant workload, in normoxia and hypoxia (FiO2 = 16%), and maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test. Results No significant differences were observed for clinical evaluation (NYHA classification, Minnesota questionnaire), laboratory findings (including kidney function and BNP), echocardiography, and lung mechanics. DLCO was lower on Carvedilol (18.3 ± 4.8* mL/min/mm Hg) compared to Nebivolol (19.9 ± 5.1) and Bisoprolol (20.0 ± 5.0) due to membrane diffusion 20% reduction (* = p 0.0001). Constant workload exercise showed in hypoxia a faster VO2 kinetic and a lower ventilation with Carvedilol. Peripheral and central sensitivity to CO2 was lower in Carvedilol while response to hypoxia was higher in Bisoprolol. Ventilation efficiency (VE/VCO2 slope) was 26.9 ± 4.1* (Carvedilol), 28.8 ± 4.0 (Nebivolol), and 29.0 ± 4.4 (Bisoprolol). Peak VO 2 was 15.8 ± 3.6* mL/kg/min (Carvedilol), 16.9 ± 4.1 (Nebivolol), and 16.9 ± 3.6 (Bisoprolol). Conclusions β-Blockers differently affect several cardiopulmonary functions. Lung diffusion and exercise performance, the former likely due to lower interference with β2-mediated alveolar fluid clearance, were higher in Nebivolol and Bisoprolol. On the other hand, Carvedilol allowed a better ventilation efficiency during exercise, likely via a different chemoreceptor modulation. Results from this study represent the basis for identifying the best match between a specific β-blocker and a specific HF patient.
机译:背景技术几种具有不同药理特性的β受体阻滞剂可用于心力衰竭(HF)治疗。我们比较了卡维地洛(β1-β2-α-阻滞剂),比索洛尔(β1-阻滞剂)和奈比洛尔(β1-阻滞剂,NO释放活性)。方法61例中度HF患者完成了一项交叉随机试验,分别接受卡维地洛,奈必洛尔,比索洛尔(分别为25.6±12.6、5.0±2.4和5.0±2.4 mg每天一次),共2个月。在每个阶段结束时,患者进行以下检查:临床评估,实验室检查,超声心动图,肺活量测定(包括总DLCO和膜扩散),O2 / CO 2化学感受器敏感性,常氧和低氧的持续工作量(FiO2 = 16%),以及最大心肺运动试验。结果在临床评估(NYHA分类,明尼苏达州调查表),实验室检查结果(包括肾功能和BNP),超声心动图和肺力学方面均未观察到显着差异。卡维地洛(18.3±4.8 * mL / min / mm Hg)上的DLCO比奈比洛尔(19.9±5.1)和比索洛尔(20.0±5.0)低,这是由于膜扩散降低了20%(* = p <0.0001)。持续的工作量锻炼表明,在缺氧状态下,使用卡维地洛的VO2动力学更快,通气量更低。卡维地洛对二氧化碳的周围和中央敏感性较低,而比索洛尔对缺氧的反应较高。通风效率(VE / VCO2斜率)为26.9±4.1 *(卡维地洛),28.8±4.0(奈比洛尔)和29.0±4.4(比索洛尔)。峰值VO 2为15.8±3.6 * mL / kg / min(卡维地洛),16.9±4.1(奈必洛尔)和16.9±3.6(比索洛尔)。结论β受体阻滞剂对几种心肺功能的影响不同。 Nebivolol和Bisoprolol的肺扩散和运动能力较高,前者可能是由于对β2介导的肺泡液清除的干扰较小,而后者较高。另一方面,卡维地洛可能通过不同的化学感受器调节,使运动过程中的通气效率更高。这项研究的结果代表了确定特定β受体阻滞剂与特定HF患者之间最佳匹配的基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号