首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Food Microbiology >Evaluation of different procedures for the optimized detection of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in mussels and environmental samples.
【24h】

Evaluation of different procedures for the optimized detection of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in mussels and environmental samples.

机译:评估不同程序以优化检测贻贝和环境样品中的副溶血性弧菌。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Vibrio parahaemolyticus is a marine bacterium with a worldwide distribution and is frequently associated with human outbreaks of infection. Detection and isolation of V. parahaemolyticus from natural sources is often problematical because of limitations in the analytical procedures. We evaluated a combination of conventional and molecular protocols previously described for the investigation of V. parahaemolyticus, with the aim of identifying the best procedures for improved detection of this organism in environmental matrixes. A total of 259 samples of zooplankton (103), mussels (48) and seawater (108) were investigated by an Absence-Presence method (A/P), whereas 118 samples of zooplankton (70) and mussels (48) were analyzed by the Most Probable Number (MPN) method. All samples were processed by a two-step enrichment procedure, firstly with APW broth and then with SPB as selective secondary broth. Detection of V. parahaemolyticus was by direct-PCR and by plate culture on TCBS and CHROMagar Vibrio, after sample enrichment in APW and SPB. With the A/P method, V. parahaemolyticus was detected in 23.6% samples by direct-PCR, whereas only 11.2% samples were positive with the plate culture method. With the MPN method, V. parahaemolyticus was detected in 54.2% and 27.1% of the samples by direct-PCR and plate culture respectively; this indicated the existence of 31% false negative results with the A/P method. No significant differences between the use of a single (APW) or two-step enrichment (APW+SPB) were observed by direct-PCR with A/P or MPN, although a significant higher presence of V. parahaemolyticus was detected by plate culture in both protocols with the two-step enrichment procedure. In conclusion, direct-PCR after sample enrichment in APW broth was the most successful method for detection of V. parahaemolyticus with the A/P procedure and enumeration by MPN. Better detection was obtained with MPN than with the A/P protocol. Conversely, the plate culture procedure showed better results with the two-step enrichment protocol in which CHROMagar Vibrio was used as the selective agar. All rights reserved, Elsevier.
机译:副溶血性弧菌是一种海洋细菌,分布广泛,经常与人类感染爆发有关。由于分析程序的局限性,从自然来源中检测和分离副溶血性弧菌通常是有问题的。我们评估了先前描述的用于研究副溶血性弧菌的常规方法和分子方法的组合,目的是确定改善环境基质中该生物检测的最佳方法。通过不存在法(A / P)对总共259个浮游动物(103),贻贝(48)和海水(108)样品进行了调查,而对118个浮游动物(70)和贻贝(48)的样品进行了分析。最可能数(MPN)方法。所有样品均通过两步富集程序进行处理,首先使用APW肉汤,然后使用SPB作为选择性辅助肉汤。在样品中富含APW和SPB后,通过直接PCR和在TCBS和CHROMagar弧菌上的平板培养检测副溶血性弧菌。通过A / P方法,通过直接PCR在23.6%的样品中检出了副溶血性弧菌,而在平板培养法中只有11.2%的样品呈阳性。采用MPN法,直接PCR和平板培养分别检出副溶血性弧菌54.2%和27.1%。这表明使用A / P方法存在31%的假阴性结果。通过A / P或MPN的直接PCR观察到单次富集(APW)或两步富集(APW + SPB)的使用没有显着差异,尽管在平板培养中检测到副溶血弧菌存在明显更高的情况。两种协议都有两步浓缩程序。总之,在APW肉汤中富集样品后进行直接PCR是通过A / P程序和MPN枚举检测副溶血性弧菌的最成功方法。与A / P协议相比,使用MPN获得更好的检测。相反,用两步富集实验表明平板培养程序显示出更好的结果,其中使用CHROMagar Vibrio作为选择性琼脂。保留所有权利,Elsevier。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号