...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of evidence-based healthcare. >Evidence-based practice in a multiprofessional context.
【24h】

Evidence-based practice in a multiprofessional context.

机译:多专业背景下的循证实践。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Healthcare today is a complex system with increasing needs of specific knowledge of evaluation of research and implementation into clinical practice. A critical issue is that we all apply evidence-based practice (EBP) with standardised methods and continuing and systematic improvements. EBP includes both scientific and critical assessed experience-based knowledge. For the individual, this means applying evidence-based knowledge to a specific situation, and for the organisation, it means catering for a systematic critical review and evaluation and compiling research into guidelines and programmes. In 2009, the County Council of J?nk?ping had approximately 335,000 inhabitants and the healthcare organisation had more than 10,000 employees. As the County Council actively promotes clinical improvement, it is interesting to explore how healthcare employees think about and act upon EBP. The aim of this survey was therefore to describe factors that facilitate or hinder the application of EBP in the clinical context.A quantitative study was performed with a questionnaire to healthcare staff employed in the County Council of J?nk?ping in 2009. The questionnaire consisted of questions concerning which factors are experienced to affect the development of evidence-based healthcare. There were 59 open and closed questions, divided into the following areas: ? Sources of knowledge used in practice ? Barriers to finding and evaluating research reports and guidelines ? Barriers to changing practice on the basis of best evidence ? Facilitating factors for changing practice on the basis of best evidence ? Experience in finding, evaluating and using different sources of evidence. The participants were selected using the county council's staff database and included medical, caring and rehabilitative staff within hospitals, primary care, dentistry and laboratory medicine. The inclusion criteria were permanent employment and clinical work. Invitations were sent to 5787 persons to participate in the study and 1445 persons answered the questionnaire.Knowledge used in daily clinical practice was mainly based on information about the patient, personal experience and local guidelines. Twenty per cent answered that they worked 'in the way they always had', and 11% responded that they used evidence from research as a basis for change. The participants experienced that EBP was not used enough in clinical healthcare and explained this with practical and structural barriers, which they thought should be better monitored by the organisation and directors.Overall, the results indicate that the scientific evidence for healthcare is not used sufficiently as a base for decisions in daily practice as well as for changing practice. This is more prominent among assistant staff. As a consequence, this might affect the care of the patients in a negative way. Increased awareness of EBP and a stronger evidence-based approach are keys in the ongoing improvement work in the county. Local guidelines seem to be a way to implement knowledge. But, as the arena of activities is complex and the employees have diverse education levels, different strategies to facilitate and promote EBP are necessary.
机译:当今的医疗保健是一个复杂的系统,对研究评估和临床实践实施的特定知识的需求不断增长。一个关键的问题是,我们所有人都采用基于证据的实践(EBP)以及标准化方法以及持续而系统的改进。 EBP包括科学的和经过评估的基于经验的知识。对于个人而言,这意味着将基于证据的知识应用于特定情况,对于组织而言,这意味着应对系统的批判性评估和评估,并将研究纳入指南和计划中。 2009年,延平县议会有大约33.5万居民,医疗机构有10,000多名员工。随着县议会积极推动临床改善,探索医疗保健员工如何考虑EBP并采取行动是很有趣的。因此,本次调查的目的是描述在临床环境中促进或阻碍EBP应用的因素。2009年对延平县议会雇用的医护人员进行了问卷调查。由有关哪些因素会影响循证医疗发展的问题组成。有59个开放式和封闭式问题,分为以下几个方面:在实践中使用的知识来源?寻找和评估研究报告和指南的障碍?在最佳证据的基础上改变实践的障碍?在最佳证据的基础上改变惯例的促进因素?在寻找,评估和使用不同证据来源方面的经验。使用县议会的员工数据库选择参与者,包括医院内的医疗,护理和康复人员,初级保健,牙科和实验室医学。纳入标准为长期雇用和临床工作。向5787人发送了邀请参加研究,有1445人回答了问卷。日常临床实践中使用的知识主要基于有关患者的信息,个人经验和当地准则。 20%的人回答说他们“以他们一直以来的方式工作”,而11%的人回答说他们以研究证据为基础来改变。参与者体验到EBP在临床医疗保健中的使用不充分,并通过实际和结构性障碍进行了解释,他们认为组织和董事应更好地对其进行监控。总体而言,结果表明医疗保健的科学证据未得到充分利用,因为日常实践以及不断变化的实践的决策基础。这在助理人员中更为突出。结果,这可能以负面方式影响患者的护理。对EBP的认识提高以及采用更强大的循证方法是该县正在进行的改善工作的关键。本地准则似乎是实施知识的一种方式。但是,由于活动场所复杂且员工的教育水平不同,因此有必要采用不同的策略来促进和促进EBP。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号