首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Research in Interprofessional Practice and Education >Outcomes of a Multiprofessional Educational Intervention in Evidence-Based Practice
【24h】

Outcomes of a Multiprofessional Educational Intervention in Evidence-Based Practice

机译:循证实践中多专业教育干预的结果

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Education is a commonly used intervention in the development of evidence-based practice (EBP). The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of an educational intervention on healthcare professionals’ perceived skills in finding, reviewing, and using research evidence in clinical practice. A further aim was to identify potential determinants for the outcome. Methods and Findings: A three-day course in EBP was designed for registered nurses, medical social workers, physiotherapists, occupational therapists, and dieticians. The Developing Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire (DEBP) questionnaire was administered before and six months after the intervention (N = 274). Non-parametric statistics were used. The results showed an overall effect on ability to find research evidence (p = .0005) and ability to review research evidence (p = .0005), whereas there was no overall effect on use of research evidence in clinical practice (p = .18). However, some subgroups showed a significant improvement over time, for example, those whose profession was nursing or midwifery and those who had experience using evidence-based practice prior to the educational intervention. Conclusions: The results showed that a three-day course in EBP improved the participants’ ability to find and review research evidence, but it did not have an overall effect on the use of research evidence in clinical practice.
机译:背景:教育是发展循证实践(EBP)的一种常用干预手段。这项研究的目的是评估一项针对医疗保健专业人员在临床实践中发现,审查和使用研究证据的感知技能的教育干预措施的结果。另一个目标是确定结果的潜在决定因素。方法和发现:为注册护士,医务社会工作者,物理治疗师,职业治疗师和营养师设计了为期三天的EBP课程。在干预之前和之后六个月(N = 274)进行了基于证据的发展实践问卷调查(DEBP)。使用了非参数统计。结果表明,对发现研究证据的能力(p = .0005)和对研究证据进行审查的能力(p = .0005)产生了总体影响,而在临床实践中对研究证据的使用没有总体影响(p = .18 )。但是,有些亚组会随着时间的推移而出现显着改善,例如,那些专业是护理或助产士,以及在教育干预之前具有循证实践经验的人。结论:结果表明,为期三天的EBP课程提高了参与者查找和审查研究证据的能力,但并未对临床实践中研究证据的使用产生总体影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号