首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Epidemiology: Official Journal of the International Epidemiological Association >A continuum of premature death. Meta-analysis of competing mortality in the psychosocially vulnerable.
【24h】

A continuum of premature death. Meta-analysis of competing mortality in the psychosocially vulnerable.

机译:连续的过早死亡。对社会弱势人群竞争性死亡率的荟萃分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Suicide may be an extreme expression of liability to death of any type. If true, suicide risk factors should also increase other mortality, and, given exposure, excess risk should be higher for suicide than for other mortality. METHODS: Of 304 publications identified in Index Medicus (1966-June 1988) by the string (suicide) and (mortality or death) and (accidental or natural), 24 reported total and cause-specific mortality associated with exposure to 16 established suicide risk factors; reference scanning yielded 122 more. These 146 publications reported on 163 cohorts (total subjects = 1179 126) mortality. Meta-analysis gave random effects standardized mortality ratios (SMR) for natural, accidental and suicidal death, stratified over the 16 risk groups. RESULTS: Overall, SMR were 8.6 (95% CI : 7.1-10.4) for suicide, 3.4 (95% CI : 2.9-4.0) for accidental and 2.1 (95% CI : 1.9-2.3) for natural death. Compatible with the first hypothesis, in most groups, mortality of any type was raised. Supporting the second hypothesis, excesses increased from lowest for natural death to highest for suicide. This trend was most pronounced following deliberate self-harm, intermediate in substance abusers, and weakest, but present, in bereaved and low social class cohorts and reversed in smokers and epileptic people. CONCLUSIONS: Many suicide risks apply to any type of premature death, whilst also retaining some specificity for suicide. Primary prevention, targeting such generic risk factors, will not only reduce rates of suicide but also of other types of death. Conversely, when prevention focuses on specific outcomes-such as suicide-only, other types of mortality may increase.
机译:背景:自杀可能是任何类型的死亡责任的极端表达。如果为真,那么自杀风险因素也应该增加其他死亡率,并且,鉴于暴露,自杀的额外风险应该比其他死亡率更高。方法:在《索引医学》(1966年至1988年6月)中按字符串(自杀)和(死亡率或死亡)和(偶然或自然)确定的304种出版物中,有24种报告的总死亡率和因特定原因的死亡与暴露于16种确定的自杀风险有关因素;参考扫描产生了122个。这146个出版物报道了163个队列(受试者总数= 1179 126)的死亡率。荟萃分析提供了针对自然死亡,意外死亡和自杀死亡的随机效应标准化死亡率(SMR),对16个风险组进行了分层。结果:总体而言,自杀的SMR为8.6(95%CI:7.1-10.4),意外死亡为3.4(95%CI:2.9-4.0),自然死亡为2.1(95%CI:1.9-2.3)。与第一个假设相符,在大多数组中,任何类型的死亡率都增加了。支持第二种假设的过剩人数从自然死亡的最低人数增加到自杀的最高人数。这种趋势在故意的自我伤害之后最为明显,在吸毒者中处于中间状态,在丧亲和低社会阶层的人群中最弱,但目前存在,而在吸烟者和癫痫患者中则相反。结论:许多自杀风险适用于任何类型的过早死亡,同时也保留了一些自杀特异性。针对此类通用危险因素的初级预防不仅会降低自杀率,而且还会降低其他类型的死亡。相反,当预防重点放在特定结果上(例如仅自杀),其他类型的死亡率可能会增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号