首页> 外文期刊>International journal of colorectal disease. >Clinical response and sustainability of treatment with temperature- controlled radiofrequency energy (Secca) in patients with faecal incontinence: 3 Years follow-up
【24h】

Clinical response and sustainability of treatment with temperature- controlled radiofrequency energy (Secca) in patients with faecal incontinence: 3 Years follow-up

机译:粪便失禁患者的温度控制射频能量(Secca)治疗的临床反应和可持续性:3年随访

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Controlled delivery of radio frequent energy (Secca) has been suggested as treatment for faecal incontinence (FI). Objective: The objective of the study is to evaluate clinical response and sustainability of Secca for FI. Design: This is a prospective cohort study. Patients This study involved patients who had failed full conservative management for FI. Interventions: This study was performed between 2005 and 2010. Main outcome measures: FI was scored using the Vaizey score (VS). A clinically significant response to Secca was defined as ≥50% reduction in incontinence score. Impact of FI on quality of life (QOL) was measured using the FIQL. Data was obtained at baseline, at 6 months and at 1 and 3 years. Anal endosonography and anal manometry were performed at 3 months and compared to baseline. Results: Thirty-one patients received Secca. During follow-up, 5/31 (16%), 3/31 (10%) and 2/31 (6%) of patients maintained a clinically significant response after the Secca procedure. Mean VS of all patients was 18 (SD 3), 14 (SD 4), 14 (SD 4) and 15 (SD 4), at baseline, 6 months and 1 and 3 years. No increases in anorectal pressures or improvements in rectal compliance were found. Coping improved between baseline and t=6 months. No predictive factors for success were found. Limitations: This is a non-randomised study design. Conclusion: This prospective non-randomised trial showed disappointing outcomes of the Secca procedure for the treatment of FI. The far minority of patients reported a clinically significant response of seemingly temporary nature. Secca might be valuable in combination with other interventions for FI, but this should be tested in strictly controlled randomised trials.
机译:背景:有人建议控制无线电频率能量(Secca)的输送作为粪便失禁(FI)的治疗方法。目的:本研究的目的是评估Secca对FI的临床反应和可持续性。设计:这是一项前瞻性队列研究。患者本研究纳入了对FI进行完全保守治疗失败的患者。干预措施:这项研究于2005年至2010年进行。主要结果指标:FI采用Vaizey评分(VS)进行评分。对Secca的临床显着反应定义为尿失禁评分降低≥50%。使用FIQL测量了FI对生活质量(QOL)的影响。在基线,6个月以及1年和3年获得数据。在3个月时进行肛门内窥镜检查和肛门测压,并与基线进行比较。结果:31例患者接受了Secca。在随访期间,Secca手术后5/31(16%),3/31(10%)和2/31(6%)的患者保持了临床上显着的反应。在基线,6个月以及1年和3年时,所有患者的平均VS为18(SD 3),14(SD 4),14(SD 4)和15(SD 4)。未发现肛门直肠压力升高或直肠顺应性改善。在基线和t = 6个月之间,应付能力得到改善。找不到成功的预测因素。局限性:这是非随机研究设计。结论:该前瞻性非随机试验显示,Secca手术治疗FI的效果令人失望。极少数患者报告了看似暂时的临床显着反应。 Secca可能与FI的其他干预措施结合起来很有价值,但应在严格对照的随机试验中进行测试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号