...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Climatology: A Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society >Comparison of methods for area-averaging surface energy fluxes over heterogeneous land surfaces using high-resolution non-hydrostatic simulations
【24h】

Comparison of methods for area-averaging surface energy fluxes over heterogeneous land surfaces using high-resolution non-hydrostatic simulations

机译:使用高分辨率非流体静力学模拟比较非均质陆地表面面积能量通量的方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The quantification of subgrid land surface heterogeneity effects on the scale of climate and numerical weather prediction models is of vital interest for the energy budget of the atmospheric boundary layer and for the atmospheric branch of the hydrological cycle. This paper focuses on heterogeneity effects for the exchange processes between land surfaces and the atmosphere. The results are based on high-resolution non-hydrostatic model simulations for the LITFASS area near Berlin. This area represents a highly heterogeneous landscape of 20 x 20 km(2) around the Meteorological Observatory Lindenberg of the German Weather Service (DWD). Model simulations were carried out using the non-hydrostatic model FOOT3DK of the University of Koln with resolutions of I km and 250 m.The performance of different area-averaging methods for the turbulent surface fluxes was tested for the LITFASS area, namely the aggregation, mosaic and tile methods. For one tile method (station-tile), the experimental setup of the surface energy balance stations of the LITFASS98 experiment was investigated. Two different simulation types are considered: (1) realistic topography and idealized synoptic forcing; (2) realistic topography and realistic synoptic forcing for LITFASS98 cases. A double one-way nesting procedure is used for nesting FOOT3DK in 'Lokalmodell' of the DWD.The mosaic method shows good results, if the wind speed is sufficiently high. During weak-wind convective conditions, errors are particularly large for the latent heat flux on the 20 x 20 km(2) scale. The aggregation method yields generally higher errors than the mosaic method, which even increase for higher wind speeds. The main reason is the strong surface heterogeneity associated with the lakes and forests in the LITFASS area. The main uncertainty of the station-tile method is the knowledge of the area coverage in combination with the representativity of the stations for the land-use type and surface conditions. The results of this study lead to the recommendation to use a mosaic approach or at least a tile approach for downscaling fluxes over heterogeneous surfaces in mesoscale and regional climate models. Copyright (c) 2005 Royal Meteorological Society.
机译:对于气候和数值天气预报模型规模的亚网格土地表面异质性影响的量化对于大气边界层的能量收支和水文循环的大气分支至关重要。本文着眼于地表与大气之间交换过程的异质性效应。结果基于柏林附近LITFASS地区的高分辨率非静水模型模拟。此区域代表了德国气象局(DWD)林登堡气象台周围20 x 20 km(2)的高度异质景观。使用科隆大学的非静水模型FOOT3DK进行了模型模拟,分辨率为1 km和250 m。测试了LITFASS区域的不同面积平均方法对湍流通量的性能,即聚集,马赛克和平铺方法。对于一种平铺方法(工作站平铺),研究了LITFASS98实验的表面能平衡站的实验设置。考虑了两种不同的模拟类型:(1)真实的地形和理想的天气强迫; (2)LITFASS98例的真实地形和真实天气强迫。在DWD的“ Lokalmodell”中,使用双重单向嵌套程序将FOOT3DK嵌套。如果风速足够高,则镶嵌方法将显示出良好的效果。在弱风对流条件下,潜热通量在20 x 20 km(2)范围内的误差特别大。聚合方法产生的误差通常比镶嵌方法高,而镶嵌法甚至会随着风速的增加而增加。主要原因是与LITFASS地区的湖泊和森林相关的强烈表面异质性。站点平铺方法的主要不确定性是要了解区域覆盖范围,并结合站点对土地利用类型和地面条件的代表性。这项研究的结果导致建议使用镶嵌方法或至少使用平铺方法来缩小中尺度和区域气候模型中非均质表面通量的比例。版权所有(c)2005皇家气象学会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号