...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of computational fluid dynamics >Comparison of Accuracy and Efficiency between the Lattice Boltzmann Method and the Finite Difference Method in Viscous/Thermal Fluid Flows
【24h】

Comparison of Accuracy and Efficiency between the Lattice Boltzmann Method and the Finite Difference Method in Viscous/Thermal Fluid Flows

机译:粘性/热流体流动中格子Boltzmann方法和有限差分方法的精度和效率比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The accuracy and efficiency of the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) and the finite difference method (FDM) are numerically investigated. In the FDM for incompressible viscous flows, it is usually needed to solve a Poisson equation for the pressure by iteration or relaxation technique, while in the LBM, such special treatment is not required. Two-dimensional problems of incompressible viscous flows and thermal fluid flows are computed by using the LBM and FDM. In the problem of flows through a porous structure, the present results indicate that the LBM is more efficient than the FDM, because there is no need to relax the pressure fields in the LBM at relatively high Reynolds numbers. Therefore, it is found that the LBM is useful for the investigation of transport phenomena in complex geometries such as porous structures.
机译:数值研究了格子Boltzmann方法(LBM)和有限差分方法(FDM)的准确性和效率。在不可压缩粘性流的FDM中,通常需要通过迭代或松弛技术来求解压力的泊松方程,而在LBM中,不需要这种特殊处理。利用LBM和FDM计算了不可压缩粘性流和热流体流的二维问题。在流经多孔结构的问题中,当前结果表明LBM比FDM更有效,因为不需要在相对较高的雷诺数下放松LBM中的压力场。因此,发现LBM可用于研究复杂几何形状(例如多孔结构)中的传输现象。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号