...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of clinical practice >A comparison of budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy vs. conventional best practice in asthma management.
【24h】

A comparison of budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy vs. conventional best practice in asthma management.

机译:布地奈德/福莫特罗维持和缓解治疗与哮喘治疗中传统最佳实践的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To study the effectiveness and safety of budesonide/formoterol (Symbicort) Maintenance And Reliever Therapy (Symbicort SMART, AstraZeneca, Sodertalje, Sweden), a simplified management approach with one inhaler compared with conventional best practice (CBP) with multiple inhalers in patients with persistent asthma. DESIGN: Open-label randomised controlled parallel group trial, 6-month treatment. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 908 patients > or = 12 years of age, with persistent asthma receiving treatment with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), either alone or in conjunction with long-acting beta(2)-agonist. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time to first severe asthma exacerbation and number of severe asthma exacerbations. RESULTS: No difference between groups was seen in time to first severe exacerbation (p = 0.75). Exacerbation rates were low in both groups. A total of 12 patients in the Symbicort SMART group experienced a total of 14 severe asthma exacerbations, and 19 patients in the CBP group experienced a total of 25 severe asthma exacerbations (annual rate 0.07 vs. 0.13 p = 0.09). The mean daily dose of ICS expressed in BDP equivalent was significantly lower in the Symbicort SMART group (including as-needed use) vs. in the CBP group (749 microg vs. 1059 microg; p < 0.0001). Mean scores in Asthma Control Questionnaire, 5 question version improved significantly in the SMART group compared with the CBP group (p = 0.0026). Symbicort SMART and CBP were equally well tolerated. The mean drug cost/patient/month was significantly lower for the patients in the Symbicort SMART group compared with patients receiving CBP (51.3 euros vs. 66.5 euros; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In Belgian patients, a simplified regimen using budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy was at least as effective at improving clinical control compared with CBP with a significantly lower ICS dose and significantly lower drug costs.
机译:目的:研究布地奈德/福莫特罗(Symbicort)维持和缓解疗法(Symbicort SMART,阿斯利康,瑞典Sodertalje,瑞典)的有效性和安全性,这是一种简化的管理方法,其中一台吸入器与常规最佳实践(CBP)与多吸入器患者相比患有持续性哮喘。设计:开放标签的随机对照平行分组试验,治疗6个月。参与者:总共908名≥12岁的患者,患有持续性哮喘,接受单独或与长效β(2)-激动剂联合使用的吸入糖皮质激素(ICS)治疗。主要观察指标:首次出现严重哮喘发作的时间和严重哮喘发作的次数。结果:两组之间在第一次严重加重时间上没有差异(p = 0.75)。两组患病率均较低。 Symbicort SMART组中的总共12名患者共经历了14次严重哮喘急性发作,而CBP组中的19例患者共经历了25次严重哮喘急性发作(年率0.07对0.13 p = 0.09)。与CBP组相比,Symbicort SMART组(包括按需使用)以BDP当量表示的ICS的平均日剂量显着较低(749微克vs. 1059微克; p <0.0001)。与CBP组相比,SMART组的哮喘控制问卷(5个问题版本)中的平均得分显着提高(p = 0.0026)。 Symbicort SMART和CBP的耐受性相同。与接受CBP的患者相比,Symbicort SMART组的患者平均每位患者每月的药物费用要低得多(51.3欧元对66.5欧元; p <0.0001)。结论:在比利时患者中,使用布地奈德/福莫特罗维持和缓解疗法的简化方案与CBP相比,在改善临床控制方面至少具有相同的效果,ICS剂量显着降低,药物成本显着降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号