...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics >Difference in risk of gastrointestinal complications between users of enteric-coated and buffered low-dose aspirin.
【24h】

Difference in risk of gastrointestinal complications between users of enteric-coated and buffered low-dose aspirin.

机译:肠溶衣和缓冲低剂量阿司匹林使用者之间胃肠道并发症风险的差异。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Difference in the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) complications between users of enteric-coated and buffered low-dose aspirin (LDA) is unclear. The purpose of the study is to examine the difference in risk of GI damage between enteric-coated and buffered LDA products.A large and chronologically organized receipt database constructed by a database vendor was utilized. Prescription and event sequence symmetry analysis was used to identify the risk of LDA-induced GI complications over the period from January 2005 to July 2011. LDA use in combination with H2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs) and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) was examined by prescription sequence symmetry analysis. Likewise, symmetry analysis was undertaken to evaluate the association between the diagnosis of GI disease and the prescription of LDA products.In July 2011, enteric-coated LDA users were more frequently co-administered PPIs than buffered LDA users (25.4% vs. 14.4%). Prescription sequence symmetry analysis of acid inhibitor use found no significant associations with enteric-coated LDA use and buffered LDA use. The event sequence symmetry analysis of ulcer, gastritis and duodenitis, and melena found significant associations with entericcoated LDA use, with adjusted sequence ratios (ASRs) of 1.58 (1.23 - 2.06), 1.30 (1.03 - 1.65), and 14.38 (2.19 - 607.95), respectively, at the 6-month interval. At the 12-month interval, analysis of ulcers and melena found significant associations for enteric-coated LDA users, with ASRs of 1.39 (1.13 - 1.73) and 20.83 (3.33 - 863.25), respectively.Our findings do not support that there is no difference in the risk of GI complications between enteric-coated LDA and buffered LDA, but rather may imply that the risk of GI complications associated with enteric-coated LDA is higher than that with buffered LDA.
机译:肠溶衣和低剂量阿司匹林(LDA)使用者之间胃肠道(GI)并发症风险的差异尚不清楚。这项研究的目的是检查肠溶性和缓冲性LDA产品之间的胃肠道损害风险的差异。利用由数据库供应商构建的按时间顺序排列的大型收据数据库。处方和事件序列对称性分析用于确定2005年1月至2011年7月期间LDA诱发的GI并发症的风险。通过以下方法检查了LDA与H2受体拮抗剂(H2RAs)和质子泵抑制剂(PPI)结合使用的情况:处方序列对称性分析。同样,进行对称性分析以评估GI疾病的诊断与LDA产品处方之间的关联.2011年7月,肠溶性LDA使用者比缓冲性LDA使用者更经常同时使用PPI(25.4%vs.14.4% )。酸抑制剂使用的处方序列对称性分析发现与肠溶LDA使用和LDA缓冲使用无明显关联。溃疡,胃炎,十二指肠炎和黑斑病的事件序列对称性分析发现,与肠溶性LDA使用密切相关,调整后的序列比(ASR)为1.58(1.23-2.06),1.30(1.03-1.65)和14.38(2.19-607.95) ),每6个月一次。在12个月的时间间隔内,对溃疡和黑斑病的分析发现,肠溶性LDA使用者具有显着相关性,ASR分别为1.39(1.13-1.73)和20.83(3.33-863.25)。肠溶性LDA与缓冲性LDA之间的GI并发症风险存在差异,但可能暗示与肠溶性LDA相关的GI并发症的风险高于缓冲性LDA。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号