...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of clinical pharmacy. >Effectiveness of clinical pharmacy services: an overview of systematic reviews (2000-2010)
【24h】

Effectiveness of clinical pharmacy services: an overview of systematic reviews (2000-2010)

机译:临床药学服务的有效性:系统评价概述(2000-2010)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Multiple reviews have evaluated the impact of pharmacist-delivered patient care on health-related outcomes. However, it is unclear which of the pharmacist-delivered interventions in these services are the most effective. Aim of the review To gather the evidence of the impact of clinical pharmacy services on the medication use process or on patient outcomes using an overview of systematic reviews. Methods PubMed was searched to retrieve systematic reviews published between 2000 and 2010 that assessed the impact of clinical pharmacy services on the medication use process or patient outcomes. Two independent reviewers evaluated the study eligibility and one extracted the description and results of the services. The methodological quality of each review was assessed with the R-AMSTAR tool. Results Of the 343 potentially relevant records identified, 49 systematic reviews, comprising a total of 269 randomized controlled trials, met the selection criteria. Clinical pharmacy services that focused on specific medical conditions, such as hypertension or diabetes mellitus, revealed a positive impact of pharmacists' interventions on patient outcomes. For other medical conditions, however, the results were inconclusive (e.g., dyslipidemia or thromboprophylaxis). Interventions that targeted medication adherence and assessed the impact of clinical pharmacy services in prescription appropriateness also produced inconclusive results because of the variability of methods used to assess both medication adherence and medication appropriateness. Conclusions Systematic reviews that assessed clinical pharmacy services targeting specific conditions were more conclusive given that the intervention was well defined, and the measured outcomes were unequivocal and tangible. Conversely, the results were inconclusive for interventions with a broader target and with monitoring parameters that were unclearly established or inconsistently assessed across studies. These findings emphasize the need to better define clinical pharmacy services and standardize methods that assess the impact of these services on patient health outcomes.
机译:背景多项评论评估了药剂师提供的患者护理对健康相关结局的影响。但是,尚不清楚这些服务中哪种药剂师提供的干预措施最有效。审查的目的使用系统的审查概述来收集临床药学服务对药物使用过程或患者结果产生影响的证据。方法搜索PubMed以检索2000年至2010年发表的系统评价,该评价评估临床药学服务对药物使用过程或患者预后的影响。两名独立的评审员评估了研究资格,一名评审员提取了服务的描述和结果。使用R-AMSTAR工具评估每次审查的方法学质量。结果在确定的343个潜在相关记录中,有49项系统评价符合入选标准,包括269项随机对照试验。针对特定医学状况(例如高血压或糖尿病)的临床药房服务显示,药剂师的干预措施对患者预后产生了积极影响。但是,对于其他医疗条件,结果尚不确定(例如血脂异常或血栓预防)。针对药物依从性和评估临床药房服务对处方适用性的影响的干预措施也产生了不确定的结果,因为用于评估药物依从性和药物适用性的方法存在差异。结论鉴于干预措施定义明确,并且所测得的结果明确而切实,因此针对特定情况评估临床药学服务的系统评价更具决定性。相反,对于干预目标范围更广,监测参数尚未明确建立或在研究之间评估不一致的干预措施,结果尚无定论。这些发现强调需要更好地定义临床药房服务并标准化评估这些服务对患者健康结果影响的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号