...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics >A controlled multicenter pediatric study in the treatment of acute respiratory tract diseases with the aid of a new specific compound, erdosteine (IPSE, Italian Pediatric Study Erdosteine).
【24h】

A controlled multicenter pediatric study in the treatment of acute respiratory tract diseases with the aid of a new specific compound, erdosteine (IPSE, Italian Pediatric Study Erdosteine).

机译:借助新的特定化合物Erdosteine(IPSE,意大利儿科研究Erdosteine)对急性呼吸道疾病进行治疗的受控多中心儿科研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Erdosteine is an original drug which has been suggested as secretolytic compound and promoter of respiratory ventilation in the treatment of acute and chronic respiratory diseases. Moreover, the drug possesses also scavenging, antioxidant, and bacterial anti-adhesivity properties. From a clinical point of view the best results have been obtained by combined treatment with an antibiotic agent of useful spectrum activity. Aim of the present study was to evaluate the improvement induced in the risk/benefit ratio by erdosteine on the broad-spectrum antibiotic (ampicillin) in the treatment of acute lower respiratory tract diseases in the pediatric field. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A controlled multicenter double-blind parallel group trial was planned comparing erdosteine, supplied as syrup 3.5% or as sachets 225 mg, versus the relevant placebo. The tested compounds were administered in association with ampicillin. Two-hundred (n = 200) subjects entered the trial, randomly selected among patients monitored by the different centers, and were assigned to one of the treatments under evaluation, i.e. active compound or placebo with the aim to constitute two comparative homogeneous groups of 100 subjects each. Subsequently each group was again divided according to age in two equivalent subgroups of 50 patients each and treated with the syrup 3.5% (age from 2 to 4 years) or the sachet form (age from 5 to 10 years). The treatments administered in the two comparison groups were erdosteine (syrup 3.5% and 225 mg sachets) or the relevant placebo. The erdosteine posologies were adapted according to age. The lower dosage of the 5-10 years range in comparison with the 2-4 years range was established on the base of bioavailability characteristics of the two pharmaceutical forms. In all groups ampicillin was administered at the dosage of 100 mg/kg/day, according to a b.i.d. time schedule. The primary efficacy criterion was the cough score evaluated in a subjective way and expressed with the following scores: 1 = absent; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe. The secondary efficacy end-points were: body temperature (expressed in degrees C); the polypnea, ronchi and rales estimation with a rating scale similar to that previously mentioned. These parameters were determined before starting of the treatment (VO); at the 3rd +/- 1 (V1) and at the 7th +/- 2 (V2) day of treatment. The body temperature was measured orally in the morning at awakening time with a mercury thermometer. Obtained data expressed in Celsius degrees are recorded by the investigator in the patient file during control visits.The safety of adopted treatments was evaluated with two different approaches. The clinical part was determined with the adverse drug reactions (ADRs) estimate. The biological safety was estimated at admission day (day 0) and at the final visit by means of a sophisticated statistical approach. RESULTS: The final results were the following: Erdosteine syrup 3.5%: concerning cough (primary end-point) in the group of patients (n = 50) treated with erdosteine it has been possible to point out a reduction of 23.8% at V1, i.e. after 3+/-1 days, and of 59.8% at V2, i.e. after 7+/-2 days. In the group of patients treated with placebo (n = 50) the reduction has been of 20.1% at V1 and of 36.6% at V2. The statistical analysis evidenced p values < 0.01 for times, treatments, time x treatments. The relevant results are summarized in Table 2. Erdosteine sachets 225 mg: concerning cough (primary end-point) in the group of patients (n = 50) treated with erdosteine it has been possible to point out a reduction of 17.6% at V1, i.e. after 3+/-1 days, and of 56.8% at V2, i.e. after 7+/-2 days. In the group of patients treated with placebo (n = 50) the reduction has been of 15.6% at V1 and of 31.8% at V2. The statistical analysis evidenced p values < 0.01 for times, treatments, time x treatments. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)
机译:简介:鄂尔多斯汀是一种原始药物,被认为是分泌性化合物和呼吸通气的促进剂,可用于治疗急性和慢性呼吸系统疾病。此外,该药物还具有清除,抗氧化剂和细菌抗粘连的特性。从临床的观点来看,通过与具有有用光谱活性的抗生素联合治疗可获得最佳结果。本研究的目的是评估厄多司坦对小儿急性下呼吸道疾病的治疗中广谱抗生素(氨苄西林)对风险/收益比的改善作用。材料与方法:计划进行一项对照的多中心双盲平行组试验,将3.5%糖浆或225毫克小袋形式的厄多斯坦与相关安慰剂进行比较。被测化合物与氨苄西林联合给药。一百(n = 200)名受试者进入试验,从不同中心监测的患者中随机选择,并分配至接受评估的一种治疗方法,即活性化合物或安慰剂,目的是组成两个相对的均质组,每组100个每个主题。随后,将每组再次按年龄分为两个相等的亚组,每组分别有50名患者,并用糖浆3.5%(年龄2至4岁)或小袋剂(年龄5至10岁)进行治疗。在两个比较组中进行的治疗是厄多司坦(糖浆3.5%和225 mg香囊)或相关的安慰剂。根据年龄对鄂尔多斯泰因病的病情进行了调整。基于两种药物形式的生物利用度特征,确定了5-10年范围内的剂量低于2-4年范围内的剂量。根据b.i.d.,所有组中氨苄西林以100 mg / kg /天的剂量给药。时间表。主要疗效标准是通过主观评估咳嗽评分,并用以下评分表示:1 =不存在; 2 =轻度; 3 =中等; 4 =严重。次要疗效终点是:体温(以摄氏度表示);息肉,支气管和罗音的估计,其评定量表与前述相似。这些参数是在治疗开始前确定的(VO)。在治疗的第3 +/- 1(V1)天和第7 +/- 2(V2)天。在早晨醒来时使用水银温度计口服测量体温。研究人员在对照就诊期间将获得的以摄氏度表示的数据记录在患者档案中。采用两种不同的方法评估了所采用治疗的安全性。临床部分由药物不良反应(ADR)估计值确定。在入院当天(第0天)和最终访视时,采用复杂的统计方法评估了生物安全性。结果:最终结果如下:Erdosteine糖浆3.5%:关于接受Erdosteine治疗的患者(n = 50)中的咳嗽(主要终点),有可能指出V1降低了23.8%,即在3 +/- 1天之后,在V2时为59.8%,即在7 +/- 2天之后。在接受安慰剂治疗的患者组(n = 50)中,V1降低了20.1%,V2降低了36.6%。统计分析表明,时间,治疗次数,时间x治疗的p值<0.01。相关结果总结在表2中。Erdosteine香囊225 mg:关于接受Erdosteine治疗的患者(n = 50)的咳嗽(主要终点),有可能指出V1降低了17.6%,即在3 +/- 1天之后,在V2时为56.8%,即在7 +/- 2天之后。在接受安慰剂治疗的患者组(n = 50)中,V1降低了15.6%,V2降低了31.8%。统计分析表明,时间,治疗次数,时间x治疗的p值<0.01。 (摘要已截断)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号