首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Biotechnology >International strategic alliances of small biotechnology firms: a second-best option?
【24h】

International strategic alliances of small biotechnology firms: a second-best option?

机译:小型生物技术公司的国际战略联盟:第二好的选择?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

International strategic alliances have often been presented as the main growth factor for dedicated biotechnology firms (DBFs). Alliances bring resources such as complementary knowledge and financial resources to DBFs. They help these smaller firms conduct R&D, and costly and long clinical essays and regulations. They build bridges with foreign capital and product markets. Even if some authors have noticed that alliances are not always beneficial or feasible, the main picture has not been altered: they are still presented as a bounty for smaller R&D biotechnology firms. Our research, based on in-depth interviews of samples of DBFs in Montreal and Boston, suggests that, in both clusters, they use alliances as a second-best option. The preferred strategy is to conduct in-house R&D supported by venture capital and capital market funds, and only sign alliances at the latest possible time, in order to complete the R&D process.
机译:国际战略联盟经常被视为专门的生物技术公司(DBF)的主要增长因素。联盟将补充知识和财务资源等资源带给DBF。他们帮助这些较小的公司进行研发,昂贵且冗长的临床论文和法规。他们与外国资本和产品市场架起了桥梁。即使有些作者注意到联盟并不总是有益或可行的,但主要情况并没有改变:对于较小的研发生物技术公司来说,联盟仍然是一个赏金。根据对蒙特利尔和波士顿DBF样本的深入访谈,我们的研究表明,在这两个集群中,他们都使用联盟作为第二好的选择。首选策略是在风险资本和资本市场基金的支持下进行内部研发,并且仅在最可能的时间签署联盟,以完成研发过程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号