...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of clinical pharmacy. >Clinical medication reviews in elderly patients with polypharmacy: a cross-sectional study on drug-related problems in the Netherlands
【24h】

Clinical medication reviews in elderly patients with polypharmacy: a cross-sectional study on drug-related problems in the Netherlands

机译:老年多药患者的临床药物综述:荷兰药物相关问题的横断面研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background Knowledge of drug-related problems (DRPs) identified in the medication of home-dwelling elderly patients with polypharmacy has been based predominantly on medication reviews conducted in research settings rather than in daily practice. Objective To evaluate the prevalence of DRPs identified by means of a clinical medication review (CMR) and the implementation rate of proposed interventions in a large group of older patients with polypharmacy in the daily practice of community pharmacies. Setting 318 Dutch community pharmacies. Method A cross-sectional study based on CMR-data of 3807 older patients (a parts per thousand yen65 years) with polypharmacy (a parts per thousand yen5 drugs) completed between January and August 2012. Data were extracted from community pharmacists' databases and entailed: year of birth, gender, dispensing data, number and nature of identified DRPs, consultations performed, proposed and implemented interventions. Main outcome measure Prevalence of DRPs, drug classes involved in overtreatment and undertreatment, and proposed and implemented interventions. Results A median of two DRPs (interquartile range 1-4; mean 3.0) was identified per patient. The DRP-categories overtreatment (25.5 %) and undertreatment (15.9 %) were found most frequently. 46.2 % of the proposed interventions to solve DRPs were implemented as proposed, in 22.4 % of cases, the intervention differed from the proposal. In 31.3 % of cases no intervention was implemented. Conclusion By conducting a CMR community pharmacists identified a median of two DRPs in older patients with polypharmacy. Overtreatment and undertreatment accounted for 41.4 % of the DRPs identified. In dealing with DRPs, pharmacists proposed a variety of interventions of which the majority (69.9 %) was either implemented or led to alternative interventions. A set of explicit criteria should be applied during a CMR to solve and prevent DRPs.
机译:背景技术在家中老年多药患者的药物治疗中发现的与药物相关的问题(DRP)的知识主要基于在研究环境中进行的药物审查,而不是在日常实践中。目的评估在社区药房日常实践中,通过临床药物审查(CMR)鉴定的DRP的患病率以及建议的干预措施在一大批老年多药患者中的实施率。拥有318家荷兰社区药店。方法一项横断面研究基于2012年1月至2012年8月间完成的3807名年龄较大的患者(每千日元日元65岁)使用多药房(每千日元日元5种药物)的CMR数据。数据摘自社区药剂师数据库, :出生年份,性别,配药数据,确定的DRP的数量和性质,进行的咨询,拟议和实施的干预措施。主要结果衡量指标DRP的发生率,涉及过度治疗和治疗不足的药物类别以及提议和实施的干预措施。结果每位患者中位数为两个DRP(四分位间距1-4;平均值3.0)。发现DRP类别的过度治疗(25.5%)和不足治疗(15.9%)最常见。解决DRP的建议干预措施中有46.2%按建议实施,在22.4%的案例中,干预措施与建议不同。在31.3%的案例中,没有实施干预措施。结论社区药师通过进行CMR鉴定出老年多药患者中两个DRP的中位数。过度处理和不足处理占已确定的DRP的41.4%。在处理DRP时,药剂师提出了多种干预措施,其中大多数(69.9%)已实施或导致了其他干预措施。在CMR期间应应用一套明确的标准来解决和防止DRP。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号