首页> 外文期刊>International clinical psychopharmacology >The efficacy and safety of 12 weeks of treatment with sertindole or olanzapine in patients with chronic schizophrenia who did not respond successfully to their previous treatments: A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, flexible-dose study
【24h】

The efficacy and safety of 12 weeks of treatment with sertindole or olanzapine in patients with chronic schizophrenia who did not respond successfully to their previous treatments: A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, flexible-dose study

机译:赛多度或奥氮平治疗慢性精神分裂症患者对先前治疗未成功应答的12周疗效和安全性:一项随机,双盲,平行组,灵活剂量研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of sertindole in comparison with olanzapine in patients with chronic schizophrenia who did not respond successfully to their previous treatments. Patients with schizophrenia who were at least moderately ill and had failed to respond to previous antipsychotic treatment were randomized to double-blind sertindole or olanzapine treatment. A total of 389 patients were treated, 196 with sertindole (mean dose=17 mg/day) and 193 with olanzapine (mean dose=16 mg/day). Both drugs improved all the efficacy scale scores including the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score. Although sertindole failed to prove noninferiority to olanzapine in terms of reduction in PANSS total score with the last-observation-carried-forward analysis, this can be attributed to the higher withdrawal rate in the sertindole group by day 16 by which sertindole was up-titrated to the effective dose. On excluding early withdrawals, the noninferiority criterion was fulfilled, as also in the observed-case analysis. They had similar safety profiles with respect to the total incidence of adverse events. The incidence of asymptomatic QT prolongation was higher in the sertindole group. Sertindole has an efficacy and safety profile that is comparable to that of olanzapine. The slow titration schedule and lack of sedating effect of sertindole should be considered when initiating treatment with this drug.
机译:这项研究的目的是评估与奥氮平相比,对以前的治疗没有成功反应的慢性精神分裂症患者,塞多多尔的疗效,安全性和耐受性。至少为中度疾病且对先前的抗精神病药物治疗无效的精神分裂症患者被随机分配为双盲方塞多度或奥氮平治疗。总共治疗了389例患者,其中196例使用塞多度(平均剂量= 17 mg /天),193例使用奥氮平(平均剂量= 16 mg /天)。两种药物均改善了所有疗效量表分数,包括阳性和阴性综合征量表总分。尽管在最后观察进行的分析中,sertindole未能证明其在PANSS总得分降低方面不逊于奥氮平,但这可以归因于sertindole组在第16天通过提高sertindole的剂量而提高了戒断率。到有效剂量。在排除早期退出的情况下,满足非劣效性标准,在观察病例分析中也是如此。就不良事件的总发生率而言,他们具有相似的安全性。塞地多尔组无症状QT延长的发生率较高。舍丁多的功效和安全性与奥氮平相当。开始用这种药物治疗时,应考虑缓慢的滴定时间表和缺乏赛多度的镇静作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号