Differences in nitrided layer between classic active screen plasma nitriding and active screen plasma nitriding with hemispherical cathodic cage

摘要

Active screen plasma nitriding (ASPN) is commonly used when regular surface hardening is necessary. The ASPN technique produces a more homogeneous surface coating than direct current plasma nitriding (DCPN) due to different process principles. The term active screen in plasma nitriding refers to a cathodic cage with a defined geometry. The purpose of this work was to study the differences between ASPN using a hemispherical cathodic cage and ASPN using a normal cylindrical cathodic cage. Following some trials using similar parameters, the tests were carried out with three conditions: with DCPN, with a cylindrical cathodic cage in ASPN and with a hemispherical cathodic cage in ASPN. X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy analysis together with energy dispersive spectroscopy were applied to characterise the nitrided layers. The nitrided layers are not the same for each of the conditions used. The ASPN with a hemispherical cathodic cage produced a layer of almost Fe_3N alone, while the other processes gave significant amounts of Fe_4N in the nitrided layer. Scanning electron microscopy analysis showed different surface morphology for each condition.