首页> 外文期刊>International journal of antimicrobial agents >Similar efficacy and safety of daptomycin versus linezolid for treatment of vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bloodstream infections: a meta-analysis
【24h】

Similar efficacy and safety of daptomycin versus linezolid for treatment of vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bloodstream infections: a meta-analysis

机译:达托霉素与利奈唑胺治疗耐万古霉素肠球菌血流感染的疗效和安全性相似:一项荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Daptomycin and linezolid are the most commonly used antibiotics for bloodstream infection caused by vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE-BSI). However, the best therapeutic agent to treat VRE-BSI remains to be established. In order to provide evidence for an optimal treatment decision, a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed comparing the efficacy and safety of daptomycin and linezolid for the treatment of VRE-BSI. After thorough searching of relevant studies from MEDLINE, EMBASE, Clinicaltrials.gov and international meetings up to November 2015, 11 retrospective cohort studies were finally included with a sample size of 1339 patients. Among these 11 included studies, all patients in the daptomycin group received standard or high-dose daptomycin treatment (>= 6 mg/kg/day). Data were extracted and pooled risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. The meta-analysis indicated similar crude overall mortality between patients receiving daptomycin and those treated with linezolid (RR = 1.07, 95% CI 0.83-1.37). Moreover, no difference regarding clinical cure (RR = 1.11, 95% CI 0.88-1.42), microbiological cure (RR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.90-1.09) or relapse rate of VRE-BSI (RR = 1.08, 95% CI 0.76-1.52) was found between daptomycin and linezolid. Adverse event rates were not significantly different between the two groups. Currently available evidence indicates similar efficacy and safety of daptomycin and linezolid for the treatment of VRE-BSI. However, the findings in the meta-analysis are limited by heterogeneity between relatively small-scale retrospective studies and should be interpreted cautiously. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. and International Society of Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.
机译:达托霉素和利奈唑胺是抗万古霉素肠球菌(VRE-BSI)引起的血液感染最常用的抗生素。但是,尚待确定治疗VRE-BSI的最佳治疗剂。为了提供最佳治疗决策的证据,进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,比较了达托霉素和利奈唑胺治疗VRE-BSI的有效性和安全性。经过MEDLINE,EMBASE,Clinicaltrials.gov和国际会议的相关研究的全面检索,直至2015年11月,最终纳入了11项回顾性队列研究,样本量为1339例患者。在这11项纳入研究中,达托霉素组的所有患者均接受标准或大剂量达托霉素治疗(> = 6 mg / kg /天)。提取数据并使用随机效应模型计算合并的风险比(RRs)和95%置信区间(95%CI)。荟萃分析表明,接受达托霉素治疗的患者和接受利奈唑胺治疗的患者的总体死亡率相似(RR = 1.07,95%CI 0.83-1.37)。此外,在临床治愈率(RR = 1.11,95%CI 0.88-1.42),微生物学治愈率(RR = 0.99,95%CI 0.90-1.09)或VRE-BSI复发率(RR = 1.08,95%CI 0.76)方面没有差异。 -1.52)被发现在达托霉素和利奈唑胺之间。两组的不良事件发生率无显着差异。目前可获得的证据表明达托霉素和利奈唑胺治疗VRE-BSI具有相似的疗效和安全性。但是,荟萃分析中的发现受限于相对较小规模的回顾性研究之间的异质性,因此应谨慎解释。 (C)2016 Elsevier B.V.和国际化学疗法学会。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号