首页> 外文期刊>International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation >Linking in situ LAI and fine resolution remote sensing data to map reference LAI over cropland and grassland using geostatistical regression method
【24h】

Linking in situ LAI and fine resolution remote sensing data to map reference LAI over cropland and grassland using geostatistical regression method

机译:使用地统计回归方法将原位LAI和高分辨率遥感数据链接到农田和草地上的参考LAI地图

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Leaf Area Index (LAI) is an important parameter of vegetation structure. A number of moderate resolution LAI products have been produced in urgent need of large scale vegetation monitoring. High resolution LAI reference maps are necessary to validate these LAI products. This, study used a geostatistical regression (GR) method to estimate LAI reference maps by linking in situ LAI and Landsat TM/ETM+ and SPOT-HRV data over two cropland and two grassland sites. To explore the discrepancies of employing different vegetation indices (VIs) on estimating LAI reference maps, this study established the GR models for different Vis, including difference vegetation index (DVI), normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), and ratio vegetation index (RVI). To further assess the performance of the GR model, the results from the GR and Reduced Major Axis (RMA) models were compared. The results show that the performance of the GR model varies between the cropland and grassland sites. At the cropland sites, the GR model based on DVI provides the best estimation, while at the grassland sites, the GR model based on DVI performs poorly. Compared to the RMA model, the GR model improves the accuracy of reference LAI maps in terms of root mean square errors (RMSE) and bias. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:叶面积指数(LAI)是植被结构的重要参数。迫切需要大规模植被监测,已经生产了许多中等分辨率的LAI产品。高分辨率LAI参考图对于验证这些LAI产品必不可少。这项研究使用地统计回归(GR)方法,通过链接两个农田和两个草原站点上的原位LAI和Landsat TM / ETM +和SPOT-HRV数据来估计LAI参考图。为了探索在估计LAI参考地图上使用不同植被指数(VI)的差异,本研究建立了针对不同Vis的GR模型,包括差异植被指数(DVI),归一化差异植被指数(NDVI)和比率植被指数(RVI) )。为了进一步评估GR模型的性能,比较了GR模型和简化主轴(RMA)模型的结果。结果表明,GR模型的性能在耕地和草地之间有所不同。在农田地区,基于DVI的GR模型提供了最佳估计,而在草原地区,基于DVI的GR模型则表现不佳。与RMA模型相比,GR模型在均方根误差(RMSE)和偏差方面提高了参考LAI映射的准确性。 (C)2016 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号