首页> 外文期刊>International journal of antimicrobial agents >Clinical guidelines for the management of neutropenic patients with unexplained fever in Japan: validation by the Japan Febrile Neutropenia Study Group
【24h】

Clinical guidelines for the management of neutropenic patients with unexplained fever in Japan: validation by the Japan Febrile Neutropenia Study Group

机译:日本中性粒细胞减少伴不明原因发热的治疗的临床指南:日本热性中性粒细胞减少症研究组的验证

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Japan Febrile Neutropenia Study Group (JFNSG) Trial was a Multicenter, open, randomized Study designed to validate the first Japanese guidelines for the management of neutropenic cancer patients with unexplained fever issued in 1998. The trial compared cefepime monotherapy with cefepime Plus amikacin combination therapy in febrile neutropenic patients with hematological disorders. The JFNSG found that monotherapy with cefepime was, in general, its effective its combination therapy. In terms of subset analyses, defervescence appeared to occur more frequently in leukemic patients and in those with profound neutropenia treated with the dual combination. The conclusion of the trial was that the 1998 guidelines were applicable to the Japanese febrile neutropenic patient population. The JFNSG met again in 2003 to revise these guidelines. An important addition to the guidelines was a distinction between low- and high-risk patients. Low-risk febrile neutropenic patients can receive oral ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin, with or without amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, oil an Outpatient basis, or intravenous (i.v.) monotherapy with cefepime, ceftazidime or a carbapenem. High-risk patients can receive i.v. cefepime, ceftazidime or a carbapenem, or an i.v. dual combination with cefepime, ceftazidime or a carbapenem Plus an aminoglycoside. Those patients with a documented infection with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus should also receive a glycopeptide. It remains to be determined whether existing assessment scoring systems apply to Japanese patients whether a broad-spectrum cephalosporin plus an aminoglycoside combination is required as the initial management of patients with acute leukemia and/or profound neutropenia; which antibacterial drugs should be used when first- and second-line agents fail; what are the appropriate oral agents and dosing regimens follow-risk patients; whether serology or the polymerase chain reaction should be the preferred marker for initiating pre-emptive antifungal therapy and whether the azoles or the candins should be the preferred antifungal agents. (C) 2005 Elsevier B.V. and the International Society of Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.
机译:日本温和性中性粒细胞减少症研究组(JFNSG)试验是一项多中心,开放,随机研究,旨在验证1998年发布的日本首例治疗原因不明的中性粒细胞减少症患者的指南。该试验比较了头孢吡肟单一疗法与头孢吡肟加阿米卡星联合疗法在发热性中性粒细胞减少性血液病患者中。 JFNSG发现,头孢吡肟单一疗法通常是有效的联合疗法。就子集分析而言,去白血病似乎在白血病患者和接受双重联合治疗的严重中性粒细胞减少症患者中更常见。该试验的结论是,1998年指南适用于日本高热性中性粒细胞减少症患者人群。 JFNSG在2003年再次开会修改了这些准则。指南的重要补充是区分低风险和高风险患者。低危高热性中性粒细胞减少症患者可以接受口服环丙沙星或左氧氟沙星,加或不加阿莫西林/克拉维酸,在门诊患者基础上加油,或静脉注射(i.v.)单用头孢吡肟,头孢他啶或碳青霉烯。高危患者可以接受静脉注射头孢吡肟,头孢他啶或碳青霉烯或静脉注射与头孢吡肟,头孢他啶或碳青霉烯的双重组合加氨基糖苷。那些记录有耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染的患者也应接受糖肽治疗。是否需要将现有的评估评分系统应用于日本患者,是否需要广谱头孢菌素加氨基糖苷类组合作为急性白血病和/或严重中性粒细胞减少症患者的初始治疗;一线和二线药物失效时应使用哪种抗菌药物;有哪些合适的口服药物和给药方案可用于高危患者;血清学或聚合酶链反应是否应该成为引发先发性抗真菌治疗的首选标志物,以及吡咯类或candins是否应作为首选的抗真菌剂。 (C)2005 Elsevier B.V.和国际化学疗法学会。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号