...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation >Comparative analysis of different uni- and multi-variate methods for estimation of vegetation water content using hyper-spectral measurements
【24h】

Comparative analysis of different uni- and multi-variate methods for estimation of vegetation water content using hyper-spectral measurements

机译:使用高光谱测量估算植被含水量的单变量和多元方法的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Assessment of vegetation water content is critical for monitoring vegetation condition, detecting plant water stress, assessing the risk of forest fires and evaluating water status for irrigation. The main objective of this study was to investigate the performance of various mono- and multi-variate statistical methods for estimating vegetation water content (VWC) from hyper-spectral data. Hyper-spectral data is influenced by multi-collinearity because of a large number of (independent) spectral bands being modeled by a small number of (dependent) biophysical variables. Therefore, some full spectrum methods that are known to be suitable for analyzing multi-collinear data set were chosen. Canopy spectral reflectance was obtained with a GER 3700 spectro-radiometer (400-2400 nm) in a laboratory setting and VWC was measured by calculating wet/dry weight difference per unit of ground area (g/m2) of each plant canopy (n = 95). Three multivariate statistical methods were applied to estimate VWC: (1) partial least square regression, (2) artificial neural network and (3) principal component regression. They were selected to minimize the problem related to multi-collinearity. For comparison, uni-variate techniques including narrow band ratio water index (RWI), normalized difference water index (NDWI), second soil adjusted vegetation index (SAVI2) and transferred soil adjusted vegetation index (TSAVI) were applied. For each type of vegetation index, all two-band combinations were evaluated to determine the best band combination. Validation of the methods was based on the cross validation procedure and using three statistical indicators: R2, RMSE and relative RMSE. The cross-validated results identified PLSR as the regression model providing the most accurate estimates of VWC among the various methods. The result revealed that this model is highly recommended for use with multi-collinear datasets (R_(CV)~2 = 0.94, RRMSE_(Cv) = 0.23). Principal component regression exhibited the lowest accuracy among the multivariate models (R_(CV)~2 = 0.78, RRMSE_(Cv) = 0.41).
机译:评估植被含水量对于监测植被状况,检测植物水分胁迫,评估森林火灾风险以及评估灌溉用水状况至关重要。这项研究的主要目的是研究从高光谱数据估算植被含水量(VWC)的各种单变量和多变量统计方法的性能。高光谱数据受多重共线性的影响,因为大量的(独立的)光谱带是由少量的(独立的)生物物理变量建模的。因此,选择了一些已知适合分析多共线数据集的全谱方法。在实验室环境中使用GER 3700分光辐射计(400-2400 nm)获得冠层光谱反射率,并通过计算每种植物冠层每单位地面面积的湿/干重量差(g / m2)来测量VWC(n = 95)。三种多元统计方法用于估算VWC:(1)偏最小二乘回归,(2)人工神经网络和(3)主成分回归。选择它们是为了最大程度地减少与多重共线性有关的问题。为了进行比较,应用了单变量技术,包括窄带比水指数(RWI),归一化差水指数(NDWI),第二土壤调整植被指数(SAVI2)和转移土壤调整植被指数(TSAVI)。对于每种植被指数,都要评估所有两个波段的组合,以确定最佳的波段组合。方法的验证基于交叉验证程序,并使用三个统计指标:R2,RMSE和相对RMSE。交叉验证的结果将PLSR作为回归模型提供了各种方法中最准确的VWC估计。结果表明,强烈建议将此模型与多共线数据集一起使用(R_(CV)〜2 = 0.94,RRMSE_(Cv)= 0.23)。在多元模型中,主成分回归的准确性最低(R_(CV)〜2 = 0.78,RRMSE_(Cv)= 0.41)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号