...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering >A robust weakly compressible SPH method and its comparison with an incompressible SPH
【24h】

A robust weakly compressible SPH method and its comparison with an incompressible SPH

机译:鲁棒的弱压缩SPH方法及其与不可压缩SPH的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This paper presents a comparative study for the weakly compressible (WCSPH) and incompressible (ISPH) smoothed particle hydrodynamics methods by providing numerical solutions for fluid flows over an airfoil and a square obstacle. Improved WCSPH and ISPH techniques are used to solve these two bluff body flow problems. It is shown that both approaches can handle complex geometries using the multiple boundary tangents (MBT) method, and eliminate particle clustering-induced instabilities with the implementation of a particle fracture repair procedure as well as the corrected SPH discretization scheme. WCSPH and ISPH simulation results are compared and validated with those of a finite element method (FEM). The quantitative comparisons of WCSPH, ISPH and FEM results in terms of Strouhal number for the square obstacle test case, and the pressure envelope, surface traction forces, and velocity gradients on the airfoil boundaries as well as the lift and drag values for the airfoil geometry indicate that the WCSPH method with the suggested implementation produces numerical results as accurate and reliable as those of the ISPH and FEM methods.
机译:本文通过为翼型和方形障碍物上的流体流动提供数值解决方案,对弱可压缩(WCSPH)和不可压缩(ISPH)平滑粒子流体动力学方法进行了比较研究。改进的WCSPH和ISPH技术用于解决这两个钝体流动问题。结果表明,两种方法都可以使用多边界切线(MBT)方法处理复杂的几何图形,并通过实施粒子断裂修复程序以及校正的SPH离散化方案来消除粒子聚类引起的不稳定性。将WCSPH和ISPH仿真结果与有限元方法(FEM)的结果进行比较和验证。 WCSPH,ISPH和FEM的定量比较结果是根据方形障碍物测试案例的Strouhal数,机翼边界上的压力包络,表面牵引力和速度梯度以及机翼几何形状的升力和阻力值得出的表明采用建议实施方式的WCSPH方法产生的数值结果与ISPH和FEM方法一样准确,可靠。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号