...
首页> 外文期刊>Advances in Water Resources >Explicit incompressible SPH algorithm for free-surface flow modelling: A comparison with weakly compressible schemes
【24h】

Explicit incompressible SPH algorithm for free-surface flow modelling: A comparison with weakly compressible schemes

机译:用于自由表面流动建模的显式不可压缩SPH算法:与弱可压缩方案的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Several numerical schemes are available to simulate fluid flow with Smoothed Particles Hydrodynamics (SPH). Although commonly experiencing pressure fluctuations, schemes allowing for small changes in fluid density, referred to as weakly compressible (WCSPH and delta-SPH), are often used because of their faster computational time when compared to implicit incompressible schemes (IISPH). Explicit numerical schemes for incompressible fluid flow (EISPH), although more computationally efficient than IISPH, have not been largely used in the literature. To explore advantages and disadvantages of EISPH, this study compared an EISPH scheme with WCSPH and d-SPH. The three schemes were compared for the case of still water and a wave generated by a dam-break. EISPH and d-SPH were also compared for the case of a dam-break wave colliding with a vertical wall and a dam-break wave flowing over a wet bed. The three schemes performed similarly in reproducing theoretical and experimental results. EISPH led to results overall similar to WCSPH and d-SPH, but with smoother pressure dynamics and faster computational times. EISPH presented some errors in the imposition of incompressibility, with the divergence of velocity being different from zero in parts of the fluid flow, especially near the surface. These errors in the divergence of velocity were comparable to the values of velocity divergence obtained with d-SPH. In an attempt to reduce the velocity divergence in EISPH, an iterative procedure was implemented to calculate the pressure (iterative-EISPH). Although no real improvement was achieved in terms of velocity divergence, the pressure thus calculated was smoother and in some cases was closer to measured experimental values. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:有几种数值方案可用于使用“平滑粒子流体动力学”(SPH)模拟流体流动。尽管通常会遇到压力波动,但由于与隐式不可压缩方案(IISPH)相比,它们的计算时间更快,因此经常使用允许流体密度发生微小变化的方案(称为弱可压缩方案(WCSPH和delta-SPH))。尽管不可压缩流体流(EISPH)的显式数值方案比IISPH的计算效率更高,但在文献中并未得到广泛使用。为了探索EISPH的优缺点,本研究将EISPH方案与WCSPH和d-SPH进行了比较。比较了三种方案的静水情况和溃坝产生的波浪情况。还比较了EISPH和d-SPH的溃坝波与垂直墙碰撞以及溃坝波流过湿床的情况。在重现理论和实验结果时,这三种方案的执行方式相似。 EISPH产生的结果总体上与WCSPH和d-SPH相似,但压力动态更平滑,计算时间更快。 EISPH在施加不可压缩性方面表现出一些错误,在部分流体流中,尤其是在表面附近,速度散度不同于零。速度散度中的这些误差与d-SPH获得的速度散度值相当。为了减小EISPH中的速度散度,执行了一个迭代过程来计算压力(迭代EISPH)。尽管在速度发散方面没有真正的改善,但这样计算出的压力更平滑,在某些情况下更接近实测值。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号