首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Aeroacoustics >RANS and DES turbulence model predictions of noise on the M219 cavity at M=0.85
【24h】

RANS and DES turbulence model predictions of noise on the M219 cavity at M=0.85

机译:M = 0.85时M219腔上噪声的RANS和DES湍流模型预测

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Two rectangular cavity configurations, with and without bay doors, at Mach 0.85 are investigated with the objective of assessing the ability of 3D CFD with advanced turbulence modelling to predict narrowband and broadband flow noise. A non-linear, two-equation, eddy-viscosity model run in unsteady mode (URANS) is compared with Detached Eddy Simulation (DES) on a cavity with a L/D ratio of 5. In a thorough evaluation, comparisons are made between DES variants published in the literature, namely Spalart-Allmaras, k-ε and k-ω-SST. We also assess the effect on the noise spectra of using different CFD prediction time-samples of approximately 100 flow passes compared with 250 flow passes. Detailed experimental data for both cavity configurations provide a valuable opportunity to compare the predicted spectra at many points along the cavity ceiling and band-limited amplitude along the cavity length. We conclude that for such cavity flows, all DES models perform similarly well and are superior to unsteady RANS due to their inherent ability to resolve broadband structures.
机译:为了评估3D CFD与先进湍流模型预测窄带和宽带流动噪声的能力,研究了两种带有或不带有舱门的矩形腔体配置,其马赫数为0.85。在L / D为5的型腔上,将以非稳态模式运行的非线性二方程涡流粘度模型(URANS)与分离涡流仿真(DES)进行了比较。在全面评估中,文献中发表的DES变体,即Spalart-Allmaras,k-ε和k-ω-SST。我们还评估了使用大约100个流道与250个流道相比的不同CFD预测时间样本对噪声频谱的影响。两种腔配置的详细实验数据提供了宝贵的机会,可以比较沿腔顶的许多点处的预测光谱和沿腔长度的带限幅度。我们得出的结论是,对于此类腔流,所有DES模型的性能都相似,并且由于其固有的解析宽带结构的能力而优于非稳态RANS。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号