【24h】

Reply

机译:回复

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In our article we pointed out that delays involved in processing multiple ethics committee applications and their variable responses for multicentre studies could be responsible for cancer deaths in Australia. It was interesting to see the contrasting responses from colleagues involved in ethics committees. Dr Irvine agrees that State-based initiatives are unlikely to solve the problem and emphasizes the budget commitment of the federal government to solving it. Indeed on page 398 of the report, the federal government says it will provide funding for the National Health and Medical Research Council to help with this issue. Although encouraging, it would not be the first federal government commitment not to be honoured when made during an election year. In the meantime, diabolecals will be routinely observed. We thank Professor Irvine for his thoughtful and helpful remarks, and we share his high hopes of the very recent initiative by New South Wales Health (although it is perhaps rather soon to be talking of a 'new era').
机译:在我们的文章中,我们指出,在处理多个道德委员会的申请中涉及的延误及其对多中心研究的不同反应可能是造成澳大利亚癌症死亡的原因。有趣的是,参与道德委员会的同事的反差很大。 Irvine博士同意基于州的计划不可能解决该问题,并强调联邦政府为解决该问题而做出的预算承诺。确实,在报告的第398页上,联邦政府表示将为国家健康与医学研究委员会提供资金,以帮助解决这一问题。尽管令人鼓舞,但这并不是在选举年中兑现的第一个联邦政府承诺。同时,将常规观察到双代谢。我们感谢尔湾教授的深思熟虑和有益的发言,我们对新南威尔士州卫生局最近的倡议寄予了很高的希望(尽管谈论“新时代”可能很快。)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号