...
首页> 外文期刊>Intensive care medicine >Evaluation of patient skin breakdown and comfort with a new face mask for non-invasive ventilation: a multi-center study.
【24h】

Evaluation of patient skin breakdown and comfort with a new face mask for non-invasive ventilation: a multi-center study.

机译:使用新型面罩进行无创通气评估患者的皮肤衰弱和舒适度:一项多中心研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patient comfort, skin breakdown and eye irritation when comparing a prototype face mask (PM) and conventional face masks (CMs) during non-invasive ventilation. SETTING AND DESIGN: Eight centers (intensive or intermediate care units). Multicenter randomized study. POPULATIONS: Patients with acute respiratory failure of different etiologies. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to CMs or PM when ventilation was expected to last at least 12 consecutive hours a day for two consecutive days. Patient comfort, skin breakdown and eye irritation, assessed by means of standardized scoring systems, were measured after 24 and 48 h and before discontinuing ventilation. RESULTS: Hundred ninety-four patients were randomized. Forty-seven patients were finally enrolled: PM (24) and CMs (23). Ventilator settings were similar in the two groups at the beginning of the treatment and after 24 and 48 h. Skin breakdown was significantly higher in the CMs group over the study period ( p<0.001). Patient comfort was higher in the PM group after 24 and 48 h ( p=0.008 and p<0.001, respectively). Eye irritation was absent in both groups after 24 h and did not differ significantly after 48 h (p=0.539). Before ventilation was discontinued skin breakdown and patient comfort were significantly higher in the CMs group, when compared to the PM group ( p<0.001 and p=0.003, respectively). Eye irritation was slightly higher in the PM versus CMs group ( p=0.21). The time on ventilation was not significantly different between the two groups ( p=0.830). CONCLUSION: The PM significantly reduced skin breakdown while improving patient comfort, compared to the CMs.
机译:目的:在无创通气期间比较原型面罩(PM)和常规面罩(CM)时,要评估患者的舒适度,皮肤衰弱和眼睛刺激性。设置和设计:八个中心(重症监护室或中级监护室)。多中心随机研究。人口:不同病因的急性呼吸衰竭患者。干预措施:当预计通气每天至少连续12小时连续2天时,患者被随机分为CM或PM。在24和48小时之后以及停止通气之前,通过标准化评分系统评估患者的舒适度,皮肤衰弱和眼睛刺激性。结果:104例患者被随机分组​​。最终有47位患者入选:PM(24)和CM(23)。在治疗开始时以及24和48小时后,两组的呼吸机设置相似。在研究期间,CMs组的皮肤分解明显更高(p <0.001)。 PM组在24小时和48小时后患者的舒适度更高(分别为p = 0.008和p <0.001)。两组在24小时后都没有眼睛刺激,并且在48小时后没有明显的差异(p = 0.539)。与PM组相比,在停止通气之前,CM组的皮肤破裂和患者舒适度显着更高(分别为p <0.001和p = 0.003)。与CMs组相比,PM的眼刺激略高(p = 0.21)。两组的通气时间无明显差异(p = 0.830)。结论:与CM相比,PM显着减少了皮肤破裂,同时改善了患者的舒适度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号