...
首页> 外文期刊>British journal of learning disabilities >Personalisation of adult social care: self-directed support and the choice and control agenda
【24h】

Personalisation of adult social care: self-directed support and the choice and control agenda

机译:成人社会护理的个性化:自我指导的支持以及选择和控制议程

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In 2007, 'self-directed support' was introduced in adult social care in England to establish choice and control - in the assessment process itself and over service provision - for all service users. The personalisation agenda is underpinned by a range of ideologies, particularly a civil rights empowerment approach and neoliberal market discourses. This research sought to explore how tensions between these discourses are reflected in the operation of self-directed support, particularly in the light of the changing political and economic climate. The small-scale study involved semi-structured interviews with 13 participants: six professionals from a local authority social care transformation team, five from a user-led organisation and two national experts. The findings suggest that whilst the choice and control agenda may be consistent with market discourses, it is not compatible with neoliberal aspirations of cost-cutting. To maintain trust and provide as much opportunity for choice and control as possible, the adjustments being made to the personalisation agenda in the light of the current budgetary pressures need to be made explicit to service users.
机译:2007年,在英格兰成人社会护理中引入了“自我指导的支持”,以在所有评估过程中为所有服务使用者建立选择和控制权,包括评估过程本身以及服务提供。个性化议程以一系列意识形态为基础,尤其是赋予民权的方法和新自由主义市场言论。这项研究试图探索这些话语之间的张力如何在自我支持的运作中反映出来,尤其是在政治和经济环境不断变化的情况下。这项小型研究包括对13名参与者的半结构化访谈:六名来自地方当局社会护理转型团队的专业人员,五名来自用户主导组织的专业人员和两名国家专家。研究结果表明,尽管选择和控制议程可能与市场言论相吻合,但它与新自由主义削减成本的愿望不符。为了保持信任并为选择和控制提供尽可能多的机会,需要针对服务用户明确根据当前预算压力对个性化议程进行的调整。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号