首页> 外文期刊>Interdisciplinary science reviews: ISR >Dancers in the Dark: Scientific Careers According to a Gender-Blind Model of Promotion
【24h】

Dancers in the Dark: Scientific Careers According to a Gender-Blind Model of Promotion

机译:黑暗中的舞者:基于性别盲目的晋升模型的科学职业

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The disparity between men and women in science is a hot topic in gender studies and a relevant target of scientific policies. The leaky pipeline metaphor illustrates the decreasing number of women along senior positions in academia; however many questions remain unanswered. What factors progressively diminish the number of women in scientific careers and why do they appear to be less successful than their male colleagues? In order to discover new insight, this work compares men's and women's career paths by taking into account academic and family milestones achieved throughout the life course. An innovative and interdisciplinary methodology (from bibliometrics, statistics, and sociology) has been constructed to examine men's and women's trajectories. Findings display gender differences in scientists' trajectories. The evolution of scientists' careers reveals linear careers for males, whilst women develop non-linear careers. Motherhood emerges as a problem for developing linear careers. And collegiate decisions of gatekeepers seem to systematically disfavour women scientists' careers.
机译:男女之间的科学差异是性别研究的热门话题,也是科学政策的相关目标。管道泄漏的隐喻表明,学术界高级职位的女性人数正在减少;但是,许多问题仍然没有答案。哪些因素逐渐减少了从事科学职业的女性人数,为什么她们似乎没有男性同事那么成功?为了发现新的见解,这项工作通过考虑一生中的学术和家庭里程碑,比较了男性和女性的职业发展道路。已经建立了一种创新的跨学科方法论(来自文献计量学,统计学和社会学)来研究男人和女人的轨迹。研究结果显示科学家轨迹上的性别差异。科学家职业的发展揭示了男性的线性职业,而女性则发展了非线性的职业。孕育成为发展线性职业的一个问题。而且看门人的大学决定似乎在系统上不利于女科学家的职业。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号