首页> 外文期刊>Intellectual Property Quarterly. >Extra Compensation for Inventive Employees: Is our System Equitable., Unbiased and Motivating?
【24h】

Extra Compensation for Inventive Employees: Is our System Equitable., Unbiased and Motivating?

机译:富有创造力的员工的额外薪酬:我们的系统是否公平,公正且具有激励性?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

There is a presumption that invention is good. It provides us with innovative goods, services and ways of doing things leading to greater employment, wealth and health. This article looks at the two recent UK cases regarding statutory extra compensation that may be awarded to employee inventors under the Patents Act 1977. Most universities worldwide and many companies have individual inventor reward schemes. Researchers now work in teams made up of both industry and academic researchers who are often based in different countries where different legal regimes apply. Is leaving the decision to award employees extra financial compensation up to individual companies unfair, unequal and de-motivating? Is having differing legislative systems in different European countries counter productive and a barrier to economic growth? There must be a balance between the inventor and the innovator. Do we have it right and if not what should it be?
机译:有人认为发明是好的。它为我们提供了创新的商品,服务和做事方式,从而带来了更多的就业,财富和健康。本文研究了英国最近发生的两起有关法定额外补偿的案例,这些案例可根据1977年专利法授予雇员发明者。全球大多数大学和许多公司都有个人发明人奖励计划。现在,研究人员正在由行业研究人员和学术研究人员组成的团队中工作,这些研究人员通常位于适用不同法律制度的不同国家。授予员工额外的经济补偿给个体公司的决定是不公平,不平等和消极动机吗?欧洲不同国家/地区的立法制度是否会产生反作用,并阻碍经济增长?发明者与创新者之间必须保持平衡。我们正确吗?如果不是,那应该是什么?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号