...
首页> 外文期刊>Injury >Different definitions of patient outcome: Consequences for performance analysis in trauma.
【24h】

Different definitions of patient outcome: Consequences for performance analysis in trauma.

机译:患者预后的不同定义:创伤表现分析的后果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Death during acute care hospitalisation is commonly used as a principal outcome indicator in injury research. This endpoint excludes post-hospital trauma-related deaths, which are substantial according to recent US studies. Two additional ways of defining outcome in trauma victims are also used; by end of somatic care, and at 30 days after injury. Our primary aim was to analyse how the different definitions of trauma outcome influence performance analyses. Secondly, we wanted to evaluate whether 30 days mortality after injury, which is widely used in other parts of biomedicine and recommended by the United Nations for use in transport statistics, is a suitable endpoint in trauma research. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the hospital based trauma registry at Ulleval University Hospital (UUH) in Oslo, Norway. Outcome measure was mortality at discharge from UUH, i.e., by "end of acute care", at end of somatic care defined as discharge from final acute care hospital, and at 30 days after injury. Analyses were performed according to conventional TRISS methodology. RESULTS: 3332 of 3446 patients from the years 2000-2004 were included. Of these, 323 (9.7%) died within 30 days of injury or during somatic care more than 30 days after injury. Mortality varied with outcome definition, with 264 deaths (81.7% of total deaths) before discharge from UUH, 318 (98.4%) before end of somatic care, and 308 (95.4%) within 30 days after injury. TRISS-based trauma system performance evaluation for blunt trauma showed significantly better outcome than predicted with discharge from UUH as outcome definition, whereas for category 30 days after injury, performance was clearly less favourable. Performance for penetrating trauma was not affected, since all deaths occurred before 30 days, and nearly all before discharge from UUH. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial number of in-hospital deaths following blunt trauma occurs after discharge from the primary institution, i.e., unnoticed when "end of acute care" is used as outcome definition. Consequently, outcome definition influenced performance when comparing our institution to an acknowledged standard. We recommend mortality occurring within 30 days of injury as endpoint in trauma research.
机译:背景:急诊住院期间的死亡通常被用作伤害研究的主要结果指标。根据美国最近的研究,该终点不包括医院后与创伤有关的死亡,这是相当可观的。还使用了两种定义创伤受害者结果的方法:在躯体护理结束时以及受伤后30天。我们的主要目的是分析创伤结果的不同定义如何影响绩效分析。其次,我们想评估创伤后30天的死亡率是否适合创伤研究,而创伤后30天死亡率在生物医学的其他领域得到广泛使用,联合国建议在运输统计中使用。材料与方法:我们对挪威奥斯陆Ulleval大学医院(UUH)医院创伤登记处的前瞻性收集数据进行了回顾性分析。结果指标是从UUH出院时的死亡率,即“急诊结束”,定义为从最终急诊医院出院的身体护理结束以及受伤后30天的死亡率。根据常规TRISS方法进行分析。结果:2000-2004年的3446名患者中的3332名被纳入研究。其中,有323名(9.7%)在受伤后30天内或在受伤后30天内进行身体护理时死亡。死亡率随结果定义而异,在出院前有264例死亡(占总死亡的81.7%),在躯体护理结束前有318例(98.4%)死亡,受伤后30天内有308例(95.4%)死亡。基于TRISS的钝器创伤系统性能评估显示,结局明确表明UUH出院的结局明显好于以UUH出院所预测的结局,而对于损伤后30天的类别而言,表现显然较差。穿透性创伤的表现没有受到影响,因为所有死亡都发生在30天之前,几乎全部发生在从UUH出院之前。结论:钝性创伤后大量院内死亡发生在从基层机构出院后,即当以“急诊结束”作为结局定义时未注意到。因此,将我们的机构与公认标准进行比较时,结果定义会影响绩效。我们建议在受伤后30天内发生的死亡率作为创伤研究的终点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号