...
首页> 外文期刊>Injury >Comparing femoral version after intramedullary nailing performed by trauma-trained and non-trauma trained surgeons: Is there a difference?
【24h】

Comparing femoral version after intramedullary nailing performed by trauma-trained and non-trauma trained surgeons: Is there a difference?

机译:比较受过创伤和未经创伤训练的外科医生进行髓内钉手术后的股骨版本:有区别吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Introduction As with some procedures, trauma fellowship training and greater surgeon experience may result in better outcomes following intramedullary nailing (IMN) of diaphyseal femur fractures. However, surgeons with such training and experience may not always be available to all patients. The purpose of this study is to determine whether trauma training affects the post-operative difference in femoral version (DFV) following IMN. Materials and Methods Between 2000 and 2009, 417 consecutive patients with diaphyseal femur fractures (AO/OTA 32A-C) were treated via IMN. Inclusion criteria for this study included complete baseline and demographic documentation as well as pre-operative films for fracture classification and post-operative CT scanogram (per institutional protocol) for version and length measurement of both the nailed and uninjured femurs. Exclusion criteria included bilateral injuries, multiple ipsilateral lower extremity fractures, previous injury, and previous deformity. Of the initial 417 subjects, 355 patients met our inclusion criteria. Other data included in our analysis were age, sex, injury mechanism, open vs. closed fracture, daytime vs. nighttime surgery, mechanism of injury, and AO and Winquist classifications. Post-operative femoral version of both lower extremities was measured on CT scanogram by an orthopaedic trauma fellowship trained surgeon. Standard univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine statistically significant risk factors for malrotation between the two cohorts. Results Overall, 80.3% (288/355) of all fractures were fixed by trauma-trained surgeons. The mean post-operative DFV was 8.7° in these patients, compared to 10.7° in those treated by surgeons of other subspecialties. This difference was not statistically significant when accounting for other factors in a multivariate model (p > 0.05). The same statistical trend was true when analyzing outcomes of only the more severe Winquist type III and IV fractures. Additionally, surgeon experience was not significantly predictive of post-operative version for either trauma or non-trauma surgeons (p > 0.05 for both). Conclusions Post-operative version or percentage of DFV >15° did not significantly differ following IMN of diaphyseal femur fractures between surgeons with and without trauma fellowship training. However, prospective data that removes the inherent bias that the more complex cases are left for the traumatologists are required before a definitive comparison is made.
机译:引言与某些手术一样,创伤研究金培训和更多的外科医生经验可能会导致干端股骨骨折的髓内钉固定(IMN)。但是,具有这种训练和经验的外科医生可能并不总是对所有患者都有。这项研究的目的是确定创伤训练是否影响IMN后股骨版本(DFV)的术后差异。材料与方法在2000年至2009年之间,通过IMN治疗了417例连续的干端股骨骨折(AO / OTA 32A-C)。这项研究的纳入标准包括完整的基线和人口统计学资料,以及用于骨折分类的术前胶片以及用于钉和未损伤股骨的版本和长度测量的术后CT扫描图(根据机构规程)。排除标准包括双侧伤,同侧下肢多处骨折,既往损伤和先前畸形。在最初的417名受试者中,有355名患者符合我们的纳入标准。我们分析中包括的其他数据包括年龄,性别,损伤机制,开放性骨折与闭合性骨折,白天与夜间手术,损伤机制以及AO和Winquist分类。由骨科创伤研究培训的外科医生在CT扫描图上测量两个下肢的股骨版本。进行标准单变量和多变量分析,以确定两个队列之间发生错位的统计学上显着的危险因素。结果总体而言,所有骨折中有80.3%(288/355)由受过创伤训练的外科医生固定。这些患者的平均术后DFV为8.7°,相比之下,其他亚专业的外科医生则为10.7°。在多变量模型中考虑其他因素时,该差异在统计学上不显着(p> 0.05)。仅分析更严重的Winquist III型和IV型骨折的结果时,同样的统计趋势是正确的。此外,外科医生的经验对于创伤或非创伤外科医生的术后版本均无显着预测(两者均p> 0.05)。结论接受和不接受创伤研究的外科医生对骨干股骨骨折进行IMN后,术后版本或DFV> 15°的百分比无显着差异。但是,在进行确定的比较之前,需要消除那些固有的偏见的前瞻性数据,后者将更复杂的病例留给创伤科医生。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号